W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Comments on the current data model

From: Luc Moreau <l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:09:32 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|fe3e62a7490f5c231afad1f179646d6en99M9c08l.moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4E935F0C.5000003@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

Hi Simon,

I don't think it's possible to explain all concepts sequentially, since 
many are dependent
on each other.

It is the case that it doesn't make much sense, in this model, for 
multiple PEs to generate a
given entity (see text preceding generation-unicity).

However, we can't prevent asserters to assert multiple such assertions.

Hence, we define a property on well-formed-ness of accounts.

I don't understand your multiple granularities. Can you explain?


On 10/10/2011 17:42, Simon Miles wrote:
> I can't see what it would mean without knowledge of accounts, or how
> it could be "correct without qualification". Surely it is simply not
> true that only one PE can generate an entity independently of
> accounts? Why do we not allow multiple granularities of description?
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 21:10:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:02 UTC