- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:00:42 +0100
- To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:15, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > We did in the telcon yesterday and last week agree that we'll try this > explicit approach with EntityInRole and prov:wasAssumedBy for now. > > I think the jury is still out on prov:assumedRole vs. just subclassing. I've updated the http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceFormalModel.html to include sections for prov:wasAssumedBy, prov:assumedRole and prov:assumedRoleAt even if we have not reached a good conclusion on how to do this. I think this approach should work for the FPWD, but feel free to edit. See http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceFormalModel.html#wasAssumedBy and below. I've also added a description to EntityInRole: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceFormalModel.html#entityinrole -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 17:01:39 UTC