Re: PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model] from Stian Soiland-Reyes on 2011-10-06 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from October 2011)

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:48:09 +0100
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
Cc: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAPRnXt=iAdioKUAphERrKnr5_+tyKWC4NWz-Cg2hf53xuuVT0Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 14:02, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> I agree with you that you can just assert it…but one would need examples. So

http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/ProvenanceFormalModel.html#example-workflow-run

links to the (manually inferred) expansion of the example:

  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/ontology/examples/ontology-extensions/workflow/workflow-inferred.rdf

If you strip out any specific wf:-properties/classes you get the
"Vanilla RDF"-version.


All the example snippets inline in the actual ontology document should
already be using "Vanilla RDF" for PROV classes and properties.



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 15:48:58 UTC