- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:44:22 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On 26/10/2011 22:11, Paolo Missier wrote: > can those who objected to changing "process execution" to "activity" or > "process" please offer a clear counter proposal. Just for the record, I'll change my vote to "-0" (i.e. weakly oppose, but won't object if the proposal is accepted). If I were then required to offer a counter-proposal, it would be to stick with "process execution" #g --
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 10:58:50 UTC