- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:38:43 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:10, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > I think it's as you suggest. We may need extra namespace for anything that's > not in the datamodel. W3 guys - is it OK to delay deciding on this until after we've made the first public draft of the ontology? Should we have aliases in PROV-O for the matching ones? How would users remember/know which term is from which namespace? # Example of aliasing @prefix prov http://www.w3.org/ns/prov/ . @prefix provo http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/ . # .. provo:Entity owl:sameAs prov:Entity . provo:ProcessExecution owl:sameAs prov:ProcessExecution . # ... prov:Entity a owl:Class . prov:ProcessExecution a owl:Class . # .. # only in provo: provo:EntityInRole a owl:Class ; rdfs:subPropertyOf provo:Entity . -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 13:39:40 UTC