On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:10, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > I think it's as you suggest. We may need extra namespace for anything that's > not in the datamodel. W3 guys - is it OK to delay deciding on this until after we've made the first public draft of the ontology? Should we have aliases in PROV-O for the matching ones? How would users remember/know which term is from which namespace? # Example of aliasing @prefix prov http://www.w3.org/ns/prov/ . @prefix provo http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o/ . # .. provo:Entity owl:sameAs prov:Entity . provo:ProcessExecution owl:sameAs prov:ProcessExecution . # ... prov:Entity a owl:Class . prov:ProcessExecution a owl:Class . # .. # only in provo: provo:EntityInRole a owl:Class ; rdfs:subPropertyOf provo:Entity . -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of ManchesterReceived on Thursday, 20 October 2011 13:39:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:02 UTC