- From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:30:44 -0400
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2011 00:31:13 UTC
Hi Paul, Thanks for pointing this out. I have removed most of the issues, except some that are open in the PROV-DM and are relevant to PROV-O (in terms of how the classes/properties are modeled). I have retained the following: > Provenance Container > ISSUE-81 > > Since, in Web applications an identifier is a URI that has global scope as defined in the RFC 3986: Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) - "URIs have a global scope and are interpreted consistently regardless of context..." [1] [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt > wasDerivedFrom > ISSUE-42 > ISSUE-43 (open but in dm) > > Both these issues are open in DM, hence for consistency and justifying their current modeling in PROV-O. > hadParticipant > ISSUE-49 (open but in dm) > > Same reason as above. Thanks. Best, Satya
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2011 00:31:13 UTC