- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 13:37:16 +0100
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
+1. PROV-SW? or PROV-ONTO for the verbosely inclined -Paolo On 9/30/11 12:29 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Dear all, > > The charter [1] lists deliverables D1 'conceptual model' and D2 'formal > model'. > > For the former, we moved away from the 'conceptual model' terminology, > and we refer to a data model PROV-DM. > > For the latter, we seem to have endless confusion about what it really > means, and what the difference is with > semantics. Also, as Graham pointed out, it is not obvious why a > developer would have to look at a formal model > document. > > 1. Given this confusion, Paul and I would like to propose that we drop > the terminology 'Formal Model'. > Can you express your support or disagreement for this proposal? > > 2. Assuming we adopt the proposal, what should the document title > become, we leave it to authors/editors to decide. > Group members may also want to make suggestions, and we could vote > on them during teleconference. > > To get the ball rolling: 'semantic web > representation/model/serialization of provenance' > > Cheers, > Luc > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/01/prov-wg-charter >
Received on Monday, 3 October 2011 12:37:45 UTC