- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:27:53 +0200
- To: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I think, Paolo, also suggested PROV-SW. Paolo Missier wrote: > don't mind PROV-O, > although PROV-OM is more consistent with PROV-DM > -Paolo > > > On 10/10/11 10:12 PM, Eric Stephan wrote: >> +1 PROV-O - rhymes with "bravo!" :-) >> >> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Jim McCusker<mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: >>> In the OWL call today we seemed to settle on PROV-O (Provenance Ontology), >>> since it's pronounceable and simple. Yes, it's a city name, but that hasn't >>> stopped other ontologies in the past. >>> Jim >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Paul Groth<p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Given that we no longer want to call the provenance ontology "the formal >>>> model" we wanted another name: >>>> >>>> Here are some proposals: >>>> >>>> PROV Ontology Model (also PROV ontology) >>>> PROV-Onto >>>> PROV Vocabulary >>>> >>>> Please send your suggestion/endorsement/thoughts in on this thread. We >>>> will try and get consensus this week. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 08:30:58 UTC