- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:47:21 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:40, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > PROV-ISSUE-90 (namespace-in-ontology): Namespace used in ontology [Formal Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/90 > > Raised by: Stian Soiland-Reyes > On product: Formal Model > > The OWL at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/ontology/ProvenanceOntology.owl uses the namespace http://w3.org/ProvenanceOntology.owl# which sound quote temporary. Reading [1] we should probably go for a namespace like: http://www.w3.org/2011/10/prov We are not following the Pub-rules if we publish a first draft with unapproved namespaces. I guess we should use http://www.example.com/ for CrimeFile example, etc (according to RFC 2606) as they are not normative. We will need to tell someone important to get the proper webserver stuff set up - but I guess before we go to first public draft the namespace should be sorted for the ontology. PROV-DM says: [2] The PROV-DM namespace is http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-dm/ (TBC). Any particular reason this is in /ns/ instead of the /2011/-style? [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/model/ProvenanceModel.html#prov-dm-namespace -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 13:48:21 UTC