Thursday, 30 April 2009
- Re: Recovery.gov and opportunity to participate
- RE: Business Software Alliance: Software and Openness Issues for eGovernment
Wednesday, 29 April 2009
- Re: Business Software Alliance: Software and Openness Issues for eGovernment
- update -- Re: plan to finish document and re-charter Group
- [minutes] eGov IG call, 29 April 2009
- RE: ISSUE-36 (Daniel): Providing Documentation/Schemas/APIs [Open Government Data]
- ISSUE-36 (Daniel): Providing Documentation/Schemas/APIs [Open Government Data]
- Re: on rewriting, shorten intros -- Re: Comments on Working Draft of "Improving Access to Government..."
- on rewriting, shorten intros -- Re: Comments on Working Draft of "Improving Access to Government..."
- Re: Comments on Working Draft of "Improving Access to Government..."
- ISSUE-34 (acessibility-intro-OGD): add more accessibility context to intro and OGD [Group Note 1 -- General]
- Re: User Group [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- User Group [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Tuesday, 28 April 2009
- Re: EOWG Comments on "Improving Access to Government through Better Use of the Web", April 2009
- Draft of Interoperability section
- Re: doc editing, authors and call for technical editor -- Re: a new member weighs in
- ISSUE-33 (OMB-A119): add reference to OMB-A119 circular to role of standards in interop section [Interoperability]
- Re: UC9 and OGD,Interop -- Re: plan to finish document and re-charter Group [was: Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- RDFa on UK Civil Service Website
- RE: UC9 and OGD,Interop -- Re: plan to finish document and re-charter Group [was: Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- UC9 and OGD,Interop -- Re: plan to finish document and re-charter Group [was: Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- ISSUE-32 (uc9-common-model): should UC9 about common model for public services be included in the doc? [Open Government Data]
Monday, 27 April 2009
- add FOAF and SIOC to P&E section
- ISSUE-31 (FOAF-SIOC): add references to FOAF and SOIC from P&E section [Participation and Engagement]
- Re: new draft of Interoperability section
Sunday, 26 April 2009
Monday, 27 April 2009
- Comments on Working Draft of "Improving Access to Government..."
- RE: doc editing, authors and call for technical editor -- Re: a new member weighs in
Sunday, 26 April 2009
- RE: ISSUE-29 (long-term): add pending text to long term [Long Term Data Management]
- RE: ISSUE-29 (long-term): add pending text to long term [Long Term Data Management]
Saturday, 25 April 2009
- ISSUE-30 (eowg-comments): Education and Outreach Working Group comments [Group Note 1 -- General]
- ISSUE-29 (long-term): add pending text to long term [Long Term Data Management]
- ISSUE-28 (next-steps): next steps sections should be filled [Group Note 1 -- General]
- EOWG Comments on "Improving Access to Government through Better Use of the Web", April 2009
- Re: new draft of Interoperability section
- RE: plan to finish document and re-charter Group [was: Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
Friday, 24 April 2009
- Re: doc editing, authors and call for technical editor -- Re: a new member weighs in
- Re: new draft of Interoperability section
- Re: new draft of Interoperability section
- RE: [agenda] for upcoming two teleconferences; announcing extra group call on May 6th
- Re: doc editing, authors and call for technical editor -- Re: a new member weighs in
- Re: doc editing, authors and call for technical editor -- Re: a new member weighs in
- Re: Open Government data
- Re: Open Government data
- ISSUE-27 (remove-negative-PDF): remove negative reference to PDF [Open Government Data]
- Re: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web
- Re: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web
- Re: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web
- Re: new draft of Interoperability section
- Re: new draft of Interoperability section
- Re: new draft of Interoperability section
- Re: new draft of Interoperability section
- new draft of Interoperability section
Thursday, 23 April 2009
- Re: Multi-Channel Section . Reinforced the re-use of government information
- Re: more examples for Participation and Engagement
- Re: Recovery.gov and opportunity to participate
- Re: Recovery.gov and opportunity to participate
- Re: Multi-Channel Section . Reinforced the re-use of government information
- Recovery.gov and opportunity to participate
- on accessibility -- Re: Multi-Channel Section rewiewed
- Re: Multi-Channel Section rewiewed
- Re: Multi-Channel Section rewiewed
- ISSUE-26 (glossary): glossary to be added to the document? [Group Note 1 -- General]
- Re: doc editing, authors and call for technical editor -- Re: a new member weighs in
- Re: more examples for Participation and Engagement
- [agenda] for upcoming two teleconferences; announcing extra group call on May 6th
- Re: "Improving Access to Government through Better Use of the Web" review comments
- Re: URI/URL good practices -- [was: Re: Group Note FPWD is done]
- RE: URI/URL good practices -- [was: Re: Group Note FPWD is done]
Tuesday, 21 April 2009
Wednesday, 22 April 2009
- RE: Open Government data
- Open Government data
- plan to finish document and re-charter Group [was: Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- [minutes] eGov IG Chairs Call, 21 April 2009
- RE: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates
- RE: Group Note -- content and sections outline [forwarding note to DL on request from Jose]
- more intro rewriting -- Re: Group Note -- content and sections outline [forwarding note to DL on request from Jose]
- Re: Multi-Channel Section . Reinforced the re-use of government information
- RE: Group Note -- content and sections outline [forwarding note to DL on request from Jose]
- Re: Group Note -- content and sections outline [forwarding note to DL on request from Jose]
- RE: Multi-Channel Section rewiewed
- RE: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates
- Multi-Channel Section . Reinforced the re-use of government information
- RE: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- Multi-Channel Section rewiewed with a number o changes
- RE: "Improving Access to Government through Better Use of the Web" review comments
- Re: Multi-Channel Section rewiewed
- Re: Multi-Channel Section rewiewed
Tuesday, 21 April 2009
- Re: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web
- RE: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web
- Multi-Channel Section rewiewed
- Re: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web
- Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- URI/URL good practices -- [was: Re: Group Note FPWD is done]
- ISSUE-25 (URI-good-practice): more good practice around URIs and URLs [Open Government Data]
- RE: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- RE: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web
- Re: ISSUE-19 (human-readable-formats): The mention of human readable format using HTML seems unclearly focused [Open Government Data]
- Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- Re: Suggestion for Introduction
- doc editing, authors and call for technical editor -- Re: a new member weighs in
- Re: a new member weighs in
- Re: "Improving Access to Government through Better Use of the Web" review comments
- Re: PDF's usefulness to the semantic web
- Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- Re: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
Monday, 20 April 2009
- Re: ISSUE-23 (improve-definitions): improve definitions by adding B2G, C2G and switch order [Group Note 1 -- General]
- RE: ISSUE-23 (improve-definitions): improve definitions by adding B2G, C2G and switch order [Group Note 1 -- General]
- RE: Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- Re: "Improving Access to Government through Better Use of the Web" review comments
- ISSUE-24 (rewriting): need to change general language, rewrite intro sections? [Group Note 1 -- General]
- Plain Language use case [was RE: Suggestion for Introduction]
- Re: ISSUE-23 (improve-definitions): improve definitions by adding B2G, C2G and switch order [Group Note 1 -- General]
- ISSUE-23 (improve-definitions): improve definitions by adding B2G, C2G and switch order [Group Note 1 -- General]
- RE: Components of Interoperability (was RE: Per our discussion, here is the session description)
- Re: Components of Interoperability (was RE: Per our discussion, here is the session description)
- more examples for Participation and Engagement
- Re: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates
- ISSUE-22 (examples-P&E): examples and more explanation about Participation and engagement [Participation and Engagement]
- more on eGov naming
- Re: Interoperability ..
- ISSUE-21 (interop-examples): add more examples to Interoperability section [Interoperability]
- Re: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- Re: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- Re: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- Re: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- ISSUE-20 (multi-channel): multi channel delivery section text and comments [Multi Channel Delivery]
- Re: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- Re: eGov IG, Multi-Channel Delivery, second draft, with a little update
- commenting on the draft and publishing final doc [was: Re: Group Note FPWD is done]
Sunday, 19 April 2009
Saturday, 18 April 2009
Friday, 17 April 2009
- RE: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- a new member weighs in
- RE: Interoperability ..
- RE: ISSUE-17 (safetoplay): safe to play [Identification + Authentication]
- Re: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- ISSUE-19 (human-readable-formats): The mention of human readable format using HTML seems unclearly focused [Open Government Data]
- ISSUE-18 (non-W3C-standards): should more non W3C standards be added? [Group Note 1 -- General]
- Re: ISSUE-17 (safetoplay): safe to play [Identification + Authentication]
- ISSUE-17 (safetoplay): safe to play [Identification + Authentication]
- RE: Group Note FPWD is done
Thursday, 16 April 2009
- Re: [minutes] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009
- Re: Components of Interoperability (was RE: Per our discussion, here is the session description)
- RE: Components of Interoperability (was RE: Per our discussion, here is the session description)
- Components of Interoperability (was RE: Per our discussion, here is the session description)
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
- Re: Per our discussion, here is the session description
- Re: Interoperability ..
- Re: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- Re: eGov IG, Multi-Channel Delivery, second draft, with a little update
- RE: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- Re: eGov IG, Multi-Channel Delivery, first draft.
- Re: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- [minutes] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009
- RE: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- Per our discussion, here is the session description
- Re: eGov IG, Multi-Channel Delivery, second draft, with a little update
- eGov IG, Multi-Channel Delivery, second draft, with a little update
- Re: Contributing to the working draft
- eGov IG, Multi-Channel Delivery, second draft, integrating contributions and comments
- RE: Interoperability ..
- Re: Contributing to the working draft
- Re: Contributing to the working draft
Tuesday, 14 April 2009
- Re: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- Contributing to the working draft
- Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- RE: Multi-Channel Section First Draft from Ken
- Re: Interoperability ..
- RE: Interoperability ..
- Interoperability ..
- RE: [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
- eGov IG, Multi-Channel Delivery, first draft.
- Re: [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
- RE: [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
- group participation -- Re: [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
- Re: [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
- Re: [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
- Re: [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
- Re: [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
- Re: [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
- [agenda] eGov IG call, 15 April 2009, 13:00Z (9:00EST, 14:00GMT, 15:00CET)
Friday, 10 April 2009
Thursday, 9 April 2009
Wednesday, 8 April 2009
Tuesday, 7 April 2009
Monday, 6 April 2009
Wednesday, 1 April 2009
- RE: [Start] applications and vocabularies enabling public debates
- Re: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates
Thursday, 2 April 2009
Wednesday, 1 April 2009
Thursday, 2 April 2009
- Re: ISSUE-14 (moreexamples): add more examples to the document [Group Note 1 -- General]
- Re: Most-Wanted .gov Info
- ISSUE-16 (OGD-examples): add more examples to OGD section [Open Government Data]
- Re: Most-Wanted .gov Info
Wednesday, 1 April 2009
- Most-Wanted .gov Info
- RE: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates
- Article from Today's GCN as mentioned on the call this morning
- [minutes] eGov IG call, 1 April 2009
- RE: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates
- RE: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates
- Re: adding the OKD to OGS section -- Re: Group Note -- content and sections outline
- CORRECTION: CALL TODAY IS AT 13:00Z -- [was: Re: [agenda] eGov IG call, 1 April 2009, 14:00Z]
- applications and vocabularies enabling public debates