- From: Miguel A. Amutio Gómez <miguel.amutio@map.es>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:33:50 +0200
- To: Catherine Roy <croy@communautique.qc.ca>
- CC: 'eGovIG' <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Hi, Ok, I review the section with your comments. Best regards, Miguel A. Catherine Roy escribió: > Hi, > > On this latest proposal, I have the following comments. > > Sub-section "How Can Multi-Channel Delivery Be Achieved?" > > I would suggest adding a bullet that suggests the use of accessibility > guidelines (such as WCAG) or related government accessibility > standards (such as Section 508 in the US, CLF-Accessibility in Canada, > RGAA in France, etc., depending on where you are). > > Sub-section "Accessibility" > > I must reiterate that this whole section does not work if you are to > keep it with the heading "Accessibility". What is being talked about > in this sub-section is *Access* of which accessibility is a part. > > For WAI's definition of accessibility, please see [1]. > > For W3C's definition of access for all or what they are now calling > the “Web for Everyone” (what they used to call “universal access”[2]), > please see [3]. > > As it stands now, you are redefining one of W3C's already accepted > definitions for the concept of accessibility. > > I would also suggest that reference to section 508 be removed from > this section as I imagine this document does not only address US > concerns. > > Finally, I think the first paragraph, which seems to be adapted from > my e-mail from last night, only adds to the confusion and was not > meant to introduce this sub-section in this manner. It should > therefore be removed. > > Best regards, > > > Catherine > -- > > [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php > [2] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Points/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/mission >
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 09:32:16 UTC