Re: Interoperability ..

Oscar,

Please, also remember Trond's email with several comments and pointers  
on Interoperability:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-egov-ig/2009Mar/0025

I split that into several issues that remain open and we should  
address, namely ISSUE-7, ISSUE-8 and ISSUE-9 at:
http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/track/issues/open

-- Jose


El 14/04/2009, a las 23:59, Luigi Selmi escribió:

> Hi Oscar and All,
> this paper about interoperability by D. Engelbart is quite  
> interesting. It contains a simple definition of the term by its  
> purpose that could be added to the definition provided by the  
> European Interoperability Framework: “The purpose of  
> interoperability is to avoid having information islands between  
> which information cannot flow effectively”. In the same paper the  
> author addressed the question "what does it cost in dollars to have  
> interoperability?". His response was that the real question is "what  
> does it cost NOT to have it". For example one can calculate what is  
> the cost of a citizen that must stop to work to provide one or more  
> documents to a public administration and of the public servant that  
> receives them.
>
>
> Luigi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: oscar.azanon@vitruviosistemas.com
> To: public-egov-ig@w3.org
> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:00:11 +0200
> Subject: Interoperability ..
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I’m looking at the interoperability section and I suggest we should  
> push it a little bit forward .. Has someone identified any topic  
> missing in the current status, or alternative visions?
>
> Another question raised – can someone provide pointers to  
> experiences / standards / etc. we should mention? For instance,  
> government interoperability frameworks, etc.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ocr
>
> check out the rest of the Windows Live™. More than mail–Windows  
> Live™ goes way beyond your inbox. More than messages