- From: Miguel A. Amutio Gómez <miguel.amutio@map.es>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:31:48 +0200
- To: "Ken Fischer ClickForHelp.com" <ken@clickforhelp.com>
- CC: 'Catherine Roy' <croy@communautique.qc.ca>, "'Jose M. Alonso'" <josema@w3.org>, 'eGovIG' <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
Sorry I meant between 'access options' and 'accessibility'. Best regards, Miguel A. Miguel A. Amutio Gómez escribió: > Hi Ken, > > I had reworked the paragraph to distinguish between access options and > availability: > > "Governments should take into account distribution, access options and > accessibility aspects to avoid creating new barriers which could limit > the amount of information or services provided. Consideration to > socially disadvantaged users, users without high bandwidth and high > cost devices, as well as devices, platforms and websites with smaller > audiences should be taken into account." > > > I think that with this wording it satisfies the ideas we want to express. > > Best regards, > Miguel A. > > > Ken Fischer ClickForHelp.com escribió: >> Hi Miguel >> I has changed accessibility in my doc to availability to address >> Catherine's concerns over the wording. It seems that would work in the >> paragraph below better. >> Ken >> >> 7th paragraph: >> >> "Governments should clearly take into account distribution and >> accessibility options which do not pose barriers which would result >> in a decrease the amount of information distribution or services >> provided." This phrase needs to be polished a bit but I am unclear >> what is meant by "accessibility options". Could you please clarify ? >> Do you mean access or accessibility ? >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2009 14:29:45 UTC