- From: Luigi Selmi <selmi_luigi@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:27:41 +0200
- To: <public-egov-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BAY101-W207E37754E6449CAA1684E908B0@phx.gbl>
Hi All, I think participation and C2G lack some explanations. Participation can be viewed in very different ways. People can interact directly with the government or between them in order to build a consensus around a position that can be voted and proposed to the government. The first way can lead to a form of populism, the second way is what is generally viewed as a better and democratic kind of participation. Participation on the Web means doing public debates on line. On a debate people should be able to raise issues, write positions or arguments, post links to articles, blog post, videos. All these data must be interoperable. Debategraph [1] is a good example of an on line application that enable participation. Unfortunately it's not possible to have the ontology/vocabulary or a kind of data model and no bulk download of the data. It would be useful to point in the document to some vocabulary that could support participation like SIOC [2] and maybe SWAN [3]. An article that can be put as a reference about debates and argumentation is "Mass argumentation and the semantic web" [4]. Luigi [1] http://debategraph.org/ [2] http://sioc-project.org/ [3] http://swan.mindinformatics.org/ [4] http://www.websemanticsjournal.org/papers/2007119/MassArgumentationRahwanV6I1.pdf "A journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step." Lao Tzu _______________________________ Luigi Selmi, MSc addr.: 12 P.zza Roselle 00179 Rome, Italy skype: luigiselmi mobile: 3482405674 web site: http://www.sharesemantics.com blog: http://www.sharesemantics.com/people/weblog cv: http://www.linkedin.com/in/luigiselmi _________________________________________________________________ News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now! http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 10:30:22 UTC