applications and vocabularies enabling public debates

Hi All,
I think participation and C2G lack some explanations. Participation can be viewed in very different ways. People can interact directly with the government or between them in order to build a consensus around a position that can be voted and proposed to the government. The first way can lead to a form of populism, the second way is what is generally viewed as a better and democratic kind of participation. Participation on the Web means doing public debates on line. On a debate people should be able to raise issues, write positions or arguments, post links to articles, blog post, videos. All these data must be interoperable. Debategraph [1] is a good example of an on line application that enable participation. Unfortunately it's not possible to have the ontology/vocabulary or a kind of data model and no bulk download of the data. It would be useful to point in the document to some vocabulary that could support participation like SIOC [2] and maybe SWAN [3]. An article that can be put as a reference about debates and argumentation is "Mass argumentation and the semantic web" [4].


Luigi


[1] http://debategraph.org/
[2] http://sioc-project.org/
[3] http://swan.mindinformatics.org/
[4] http://www.websemanticsjournal.org/papers/2007119/MassArgumentationRahwanV6I1.pdf



"A journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step." Lao Tzu

_______________________________ 
Luigi Selmi, MSc 
addr.: 12 P.zza Roselle 00179 Rome, Italy 
skype: luigiselmi 
mobile: 3482405674 
web site: http://www.sharesemantics.com
blog: http://www.sharesemantics.com/people/weblog
cv: http://www.linkedin.com/in/luigiselmi
 


_________________________________________________________________
News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now!
http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx

Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 10:30:22 UTC