public-dwbp-wg@w3.org from March 2016 by author

Andrea Perego

• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - metadata on metadata quality (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - representing conformance levels (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP (Monday, 7 March)

Annette Greiner

• Re: Data reuse split into 3 - review (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: Example of BP Provide bulk download (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: DWBP - Last Call before CR (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: Example of BP Provide bulk download (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Provide Access to Subsets - 2 real examples (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: Provide Access to Subsets - 2 real examples (Friday, 25 March)
• old issues we've been ignoring (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Fwd: Comments on Tracker (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Subsetting BP (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Review of BP on data re-use (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-248 (feedback-reuse): To change the Feedback section to Data Reuse section. [Best practices document(s)] (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: updates to BP doc (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: Open Issues to be closed during the F2F Zagreb (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: Correspond Example number to BP number (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• updates to BP doc (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: ISSUE-94: Dataset versioning and dataset replication (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: addressing old comments from Erik W (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications (Friday, 4 March)
• data "enrichment" (Friday, 4 March)
• addressing old comments from Erik W (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: content negotiation in BP doc (Tuesday, 1 March)

Antoine Isaac

• Re: dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222 (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: New dqv:inDimension (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-253: Add proposed text above in the minutes on 2016-03-14 and close issue 181 (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Review of BP on data re-use (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-254: Turn the text of issue 11 into a note in the doc (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: updates to BP doc (Monday, 14 March)
• Updates examples for BP Choose the right formalization level (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: Action-148 (Monday, 14 March)
• Links between (vocabulary and quality) requirements and BPs (Monday, 14 March)
• New DQV example for Quality Policy (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Saturday, 12 March)
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: Relation between dqv:qualityAssessment and Web Annotation motivations (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - Issue-202 - representing conformance (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Comments / Actions / Issues (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Comments / Actions / Issues (Wednesday, 9 March)
• BPs on data and metadata (was: metadata on metadata quality) (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - representing conformance levels (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - metadata on metadata quality (Monday, 7 March)
• Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP (Monday, 7 March)
• Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 (Sunday, 6 March)
• Re: some thoughts on https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/222 (Sunday, 6 March)
• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications (Friday, 4 March)
• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications (Friday, 4 March)
• Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: Language properties - eating one's own dog food (Thursday, 3 March)
• Re: Questions about provenance BP 6 (Thursday, 3 March)

Bernadette Farias Lóscio

• Feedback about examples (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: old issues we've been ignoring (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: Data Identification BPs (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: Subsetting BP (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Review of BP on data re-use (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Review of BP Enable Data Subsetting (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Review of BP on data re-use (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-230: Should we consider other BP benefits? [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: Updates and suggestions to BP17 Reuse vocabularies (Friday, 11 March)
• DWBP Open issues (Friday, 11 March)
• ISSUE-239: machine-readable standardized data formats - serialization data formats - dataset formats (Friday, 11 March)
• ISSUE-242: APIs on the Web (for publishing Data on the Web) Best Practices (Friday, 11 March)
• ISSUE-232: Sort out what is a CSV and what is a JSON file in the example (Friday, 11 March)
• ISSUE-228: Should we include definitions on the glossary to explain other terms used in the Context section? (Friday, 11 March)
• ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] (Friday, 11 March)
• ISSUE-148: Can we use the five star rating system as a BP document metric to describe Open Data instead of a path to LD? (Thursday, 10 March)
• ISSUE-94: Dataset versioning and dataset replication (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Questions about provenance BP 6 (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Re: Spatial Data on the Web meeting this week (Tuesday, 1 March)

Caroline Burle

• Re: Update BP Use persistent URIs as identifiers of datasets (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Update BP Use persistent URIs as identifiers of datasets (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Example of BP Provide real-time access (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Example of BP Provide bulk download (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Fwd: International Open Data Conference in Madrid - Proposals (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Today's Timing (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Wish list (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Helping with reviews (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: some comments on the DWBP draft (Wednesday, 16 March)
• Re: updates to BP doc (Monday, 14 March)
• Comments on Tracker (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: addressing old comments from Erik W (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: comments regarding versioning (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: comments regarding versioning (Monday, 14 March)
• Open Issues to be closed during the F2F Zagreb (Sunday, 13 March)
• Help with issues 245 and (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow… (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: [DWBP] Status of comments on Comment Tracker (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: addressing old comments from Erik W (Tuesday, 8 March)

Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker

• dwbp-ISSUE-251: [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 31 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace (Wednesday, 16 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-270: Validate html and accessibility rules of dwbp-example.html (Wednesday, 16 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-269: Top creatre wiki page to collect a wish list for a future wg (Tuesday, 15 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-268: Add intro to daq in the dqv (Tuesday, 15 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-267: Attempt to merge the bps on api documetnation (Tuesday, 15 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-266: Include namespace table at top (Tuesday, 15 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-265: Add line on frag identifiers in best practice 15: provide data in multiple formats (Tuesday, 15 March)
• dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-264: Ensure that the bp doc refers to the example for representing precision and accuracy in the dqv (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ISSUE-249 (fragment identifiers): Discussion about fragment identifiers [Best practices document(s)] (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-263: Assess compatibility of dqv with data cube by 2016-04-15 (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-262: Turn an existing paragraph on representing conformance and non-conformance into the note pointing to geodcat-ap (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-261: Add a note to the effect of the decision about using shacl rather than abstract and sub classes. (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-260: to ensure text makes clear that dimensions anad categories are defined as subclasses of skos:concept (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-259: Add examples showing user feedback for questioning and classification. (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-258: Remove the domain from dqv:indimension, move it from section measurement and add it in the dqv diagram and send a email to jeremy. with the new definition of dqv:indimension, where dqv:indimension is a super-property of the inverse of daq:hasmetric (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-257: Add a table describing the resource dqv:qualutyassessment (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-256: Add a note saying that new motivations can be defined but that this should be done following the open annotation guidelines (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222 (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-254: Turn the text of issue 11 into a note in the doc (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-253: Add proposed text above in the minutes on 2016-03-14 and close issue 181 (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-252: Create time table for duv progress/iterations (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-250: Update the config on respec with the public mailing address and answer comment lc-3062 (https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/wd-dwbp-20150625/3062) (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-249: Answer comment 3051 from eric wilde (https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/wd-dwbp-20150224/3051) (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-248: Write a bp around accuracy and precision, the pitfalls of false accuracy etc. (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-247: Fill in the blanks in table at http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#requirements (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ISSUE-248 (feedback-reuse): To change the Feedback section to Data Reuse section. [Best practices document(s)] (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-246: Rewrite bp11, in particular the way the external refs are included (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-245: Update bp 11 table to link to the pdf and the gh update. (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-244: Remove the 2nd line of test section and rewrite the intended outcome of the bp2 provide descriptive metadata (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-243: Arrange redseign of the challenges diagram (Monday, 14 March)
• dwbp-ISSUE-247 (dataset-discovery): How to test dataset discoverability? [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• dwbp-ISSUE-246: Find an alternative to make the Challenges' diagram bigger [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• dwbp-ISSUE-245 (summary-filter): To include filters in the summary to sort BPs according to Benefits or Challenges [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-242: Follow up on issue 220 (Friday, 11 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-241: Review bp 22 (Friday, 11 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-240: Work on the bp for enriching data before the f2f (Friday, 11 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-239: Check on using an example about real-time data for bp23 (Friday, 11 March)
• dwbp-ISSUE-244: Replacing sections Data on the Web Challenges and BP Benefits [Best practices document(s)] (Thursday, 10 March)
• dwbp-ISSUE-243: Representing precision and accuracy [Quality & Granularity Vocabulary] (Monday, 7 March)
• dwbp-ACTION-238: Include rdfa to the human-readable example of strucutral metadata (dwbp-example.html) (Friday, 4 March)

Debattista, Jeremy

• Re: New dqv:inDimension (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: New dqv:inDimension (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: New dqv:inDimension (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 (Wednesday, 16 March)

Deirdre Lee

• International Open Data Conference in Madrid - DWBP Proposal (Thursday, 31 March)
• Agenda for tomorrow's meeting (Thursday, 31 March)
• DWBP - Last Call before CR (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: Review of BP Enable Data Subsetting (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Review of BP on data re-use (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-230: Should we consider other BP benefits? [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-226: Should we remove the Reuse benefit? [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• Correspond Example number to BP number (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: ISSUE-220: Should we include a more complexe example to illustrate provenance? (Sunday, 13 March)
• ISSUE-167 Re: Language properties - eating one's own dog food (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-247 (dataset-discovery): How to test dataset discoverability? [Best practices document(s)] (Sunday, 13 March)
• Re: Comments / Actions / Issues (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Comments / Actions / Issues (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: [DWBP] Status of comments on Comment Tracker - for all doc editors (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Agenda for tomorrow - countdown to Zagreb (Thursday, 3 March)

Eric Stephan

• Re: Example of BP Provide bulk download (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: Example of BP Provide bulk download (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description (Tuesday, 29 March)
• issue-219 Removing Section 9 in DUV (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Subsetting BP (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: Subsetting BP (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Subsetting BP (Wednesday, 23 March)
• action-252 data usage vocabulary timetable (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Review of BP Enable Data Subsetting (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Data usage vocabulary examples updated (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Data usage vocabulary examples updated (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Regrets for tomorrow... (Tuesday, 15 March)
• DUV updates... (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)] (Monday, 14 March)
• BP #30 https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#GatherFeedback (Friday, 11 March)
• Remaining work on DUV (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: dwbp-ISSUE-235: Namespaces in DUV [Data Usage Vocabulary] (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Zagreb F2F Remote participation (Thursday, 10 March)

Ghislain Atemezing

• Re: Suggestions for ACTION-227: Work with eric s on writing section on evolution of duv wrt reuse of namespaces etc. (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Open Issues to be closed during the F2F Zagreb (Monday, 14 March)

Hadley Beeman

• Re: [dwbp] Changes on Data Reuse section (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Today's call is NOW (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Agenda for the rescheduled call TOMORROW (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Agenda for tomorrow… (Thursday, 10 March)

Ig Ibert Bittencourt

• [DWBP] Intended Outcomes and Tests (Wednesday, 30 March)

Laufer

• Re: Data reuse split into 3 - review (Thursday, 31 March)
• Data reuse split into 3 - review (Thursday, 31 March)
• Re: Provide Access to Subsets - 2 real examples (Friday, 25 March)
• Provide Access to Subsets - 2 real examples (Friday, 25 March)
• Review of BP Enable Data Subsetting (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: Review of BP on data re-use (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow… (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications (Friday, 4 March)
• New BP (?) - Using standards for distributing datasets for specific domains or applications (Friday, 4 March)

Martin Alvarez-Espinar

• Re: Fwd: International Open Data Conference in Madrid - Proposals (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Fwd: International Open Data Conference in Madrid - Proposals (Tuesday, 22 March)

Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

• Re: Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? (issue 200) (Friday, 4 March)

Newton Calegari

• [dwbp] Changes on Data Reuse section (Monday, 28 March)
• Re: Updates examples for BP Choose the right formalization level (Tuesday, 15 March)
• close dwbp-ACTION-250: Update the config on respec with the public mailing address and answer comment lc-3062 (https://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/68239/wd-dwbp-20150625/3062) (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: comments regarding versioning (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: ISSUE-240: To consider a new bp around numeric accuracy. comes from sdw's concern about useless extra decmimal places (Monday, 14 March)
• Re: BP #30 https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#GatherFeedback (Friday, 11 March)
• Re: Language properties - eating one's own dog food (Wednesday, 2 March)

Phil Archer

• Data Identification BPs (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Re: Update BP Use persistent URIs as identifiers of datasets (Wednesday, 30 March)
• Meeting time this week (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: Subsetting BP (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Subsetting BP (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Today's Timing (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Meeting Dates w/c 21 and 28 March (Tuesday, 15 March)
• Re: updates to BP doc (Sunday, 13 March)
• [Minutes] 2016-03-11 (Friday, 11 March)
• Zagreb F2F Remote participation (Wednesday, 9 March)
• Re: Comments / Actions / Issues (Wednesday, 9 March)
• [Minutes] 2016-03-04 (Friday, 4 March)
• [Minutes] 2016-02-26 (Friday, 4 March)
• [Minutes] 2016-03-02 (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Machine Readable Example 2 (Wednesday, 2 March)
• Fwd: Spatial Data on the Web meeting this week (Tuesday, 1 March)
• Fwd: Spatial Data on the Web meeting this week (Tuesday, 1 March)

Riccardo Albertoni

• Re: DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description (Wednesday, 30 March)
• DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace (Tuesday, 29 March)
• Fwd: New dqv:inDimension (Friday, 25 March)
• Fwd: New dqv:inDimension (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-271: create a dimension for precision in the DQV namespace (Friday, 25 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-260: to ensure text makes clear that dimensions anad categories are defined as subclasses of skos:concept (Thursday, 24 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-251: Work with ericstephan on creating examples of dataset usage counts in the dqv (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222 (Wednesday, 23 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-259: Add examples showing user feedback for questioning and classification. (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-256: Add a note saying that new motivations can be defined but that this should be done following the open annotation guidelines (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-255: Create an example using prov:wasderivedfrom in the dqv, close issue-222 (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-253: Add proposed text above in the minutes on 2016-03-14 and close issue 181 (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-253: Add proposed text above in the minutes on 2016-03-14 and close issue 181 (Saturday, 19 March)
• Re: New dqv:inDimension (Friday, 18 March)
• Re: New dqv:inDimension (Friday, 18 March)
• New dqv:inDimension (Thursday, 17 March)
• Re: Relation between dqv:qualityAssessment and Web Annotation motivations (Thursday, 10 March)
• Re: Parameters for metrics - Issue-223 (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: dwbp-ACTION-219: Send an email to discuss the suggestion to add the assertion that a dataset's metadata conforms to a standard (like geojson) (Tuesday, 8 March)
• Re: Relation between dqv:qualityAssessment and Web Annotation motivations (Thursday, 3 March)
• Fwd: Can we align the quality dimension hints in DQV with the ones in ISO 25012? (issue 200) (Thursday, 3 March)

yaso

• Re: Agenda for the rescheduled call TOMORROW (Tuesday, 22 March)
• Action-148 (Monday, 14 March)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2016 23:11:09 UTC