W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: DQV provenance example and RDF vocabulary to specify software description

From: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:22:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMFz4jgZEUWodUEQp5=6AJhFOXJuXV47tTTQQpDP6cYcHRgtBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Cc: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Riccardo,

*"# Further details about quality services/software can be provided, for
example, deploying  vocabularies such as Data Usage Vocabulary (DUV),
 Dublin Core or  ADMS.SW.*

*Could this work?"*

Yes!  Just a thought as well for more of a simplistic approach, you could
look at the Minimal Service Model [1].  It reuses dublin core terms and it
has a pretty straight forward representation.

I like your idea about adding in a footnote to other vocabularies.

Thanks,

Eric

References
[1] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/vocabs/msm

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Riccardo Albertoni <
albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> wrote:

> Hi Eric,
> Thanks for this suggestion,
>   I like the idea to reuse the duv:UsageTool, however, I am not sure that
> the quality checking can be considered a usage itself: I tend to think that
>  users check the quality to see if a dataset is good enough to fit for a
> certain usage, which implies that quality checking is not exactly a
> "proper" kind of usage   as it seems required in UsageTool...
>
> I wonder if something like ADMS.SW [1] can apply here,  even if I have to
> admit  that I won't  have the time to go through such a complex vocabulary.
>
> Considering that  so far we have not discussed  any specific vocabulary
>  for documenting software and services in details, and  that  we are
> probably not in the position to have a proper discussion on that due to the
> lack of time, I would consider the recommendation of   a specific
> vocabulary for documenting software and services out of the DQV scope.
>
> I simply propose to  replace in the two provenance examples  the current
> comment
>
>    # We should probably suggest to add more info about the services
>
> with something like
>
> # Further details about quality services/software can be provided, for
> example, deploying  vocabularies such as Data Usage Vocabulary (DUV),
>  Dublin Core or  ADMS.SW.
>
> Could this work?
> Riccardo
>
> [1]https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms_foss/description
>
>
> On 29 March 2016 at 18:02, Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Riccardo,
>>
>> Would it be appropriate to use the Data Usage Vocab for this as a
>> UsageTool?
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Mar 29, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Riccardo Albertoni <
>> albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I have just added in DQV an example we have planned since quite a long,
>> the  example about "the provenance of single quality measurement", see
>> [1].
>> Please take a look and let me know your comments/ corrections.
>>
>> Now we have two main provenance examples, the aformenetioned and the one
>> about provenanc
>> bout  the provenance of the quality metadata[2]. In both,   the quality
>> measurements are    generated by  :qualityChecker, which is a Software
>> agent  defined as in the following
>>
>> :qualityChecker
>>     a prov:SoftwareAgent ;
>>     rdfs:label "a quality assessment service"^^xsd:string
>>     .
>>
>>
>> I wonder if for the sake of reproducibility, we should suggest to add
>> more details about the service/software which has generated the
>> measurement, for example,  an URL or some information about sw version and
>> so on.
>> Does anyone of you know a good rdf vocab that can help in specifying a
>> little more the software/service?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Cheers,
>> Riccardo
>>
>> [1] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#DocumentProvSingleQM
>> [2]
>> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#DocumentProvenanceQualityMetadata
>>
>> --
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Riccardo Albertoni
>> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
>> Magenes"
>> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
>> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
>> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
>> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
>> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
>> www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>*
>> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
>> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Riccardo Albertoni
> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
> Magenes"
> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
> www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>*
> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:22:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 March 2016 20:22:32 UTC