- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:37:55 -0700
- To: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
- Cc: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
There are a few exceptions, or at least have been in the past. I think it would make sense to keep the flexibility of not requiring a one-to-one relationship. Sent from a keyboard-challenged device > On Mar 13, 2016, at 12:30 PM, Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com> wrote: > > Hi, > A suggestion for numbering - as there's a one-to-one BP to example relationship, maybe makes sense to keep numbers aligned, e.g. example 4 is part of bp 4. > We could rename 'Example 1' as 'base example' or 'core example' or something? > Cheers, > Deirdre > > -- > ------------------------------------ > Deirdre Lee, CEO & Founder > Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions > Web: www.derilinx.com > Email: deirdre@derilinx.com > Address: 11/12 Baggot Court, Dublin 2, D02 F891 > Tel: +353 (0)1 254 4316 > Mob: +353 (0)87 417 2318 > Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/ > Twitter: @deirdrelee > >
Received on Sunday, 13 March 2016 19:38:30 UTC