W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: Correspond Example number to BP number

From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:37:55 -0700
Cc: Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <02639175-282D-4B8A-B578-EE549FF1FFBA@lbl.gov>
To: Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com>
There are a few exceptions, or at least have been in the past. I think it would make sense to keep the flexibility of not requiring a one-to-one relationship.

Sent from a keyboard-challenged device

> On Mar 13, 2016, at 12:30 PM, Deirdre Lee <deirdre@derilinx.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> A suggestion for numbering - as there's a one-to-one BP to example relationship, maybe makes sense to keep numbers aligned, e.g. example 4 is part of bp 4.
> We could rename 'Example 1' as 'base example' or 'core example' or something?
> Cheers,
> Deirdre
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------
> Deirdre Lee, CEO & Founder
> Derilinx - Linked & Open Data Solutions
> Web:      www.derilinx.com
> Email:    deirdre@derilinx.com
> Address:  11/12 Baggot Court, Dublin 2, D02 F891
> Tel:      +353 (0)1 254 4316
> Mob:      +353 (0)87 417 2318
> Linkedin: ie.linkedin.com/in/leedeirdre/
> Twitter:  @deirdrelee
> 
> 
Received on Sunday, 13 March 2016 19:38:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 13 March 2016 19:38:31 UTC