W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)]

From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:52:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CANx1PzwpLKHbyB7RN-7LfUr1pk8vKbTPErsjP_QiGU_hc2VPjw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hello Annette,

It is really a common practice to include a namespace table on W3C
documents.

Antoine  also mentioned this in one of his messages [1].

Thanks!

Bernadette

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2016Feb/0088.html

2016-03-14 23:50 GMT+01:00 Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>:

> Why would we need that? The examples are fictitious and should have no
> life beyond our doc.
>
>
> On 3/14/16 3:27 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Create an appendix.
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Data on the Web Best Practices Working
> Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces
>> that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/250
>>
>> Raised by: Bernadette Farias Loscio
>> On product: Best practices document(s)
>>
>> If not, where should we include the namespaces?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Annette Greiner
> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:53:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:53:15 UTC