W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2016

ISSUE-228: Should we include definitions on the glossary to explain other terms used in the Context section?

From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:19:56 -0300
Message-ID: <CANx1PzwcCQBOOb9Y_i6MU-V9rj=LLai5CM+iGCnwvpR16zO8jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi all,

We propose to close  Issue-228.

We didn't receive feedback about this. We suppose that the glossary is ok.

https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/228
<https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/220>

Cheers,
DWBP editors

-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 02:20:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 11 March 2016 02:20:47 UTC