W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: New dqv:inDimension

From: Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:35:35 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOHhXmSkbKHWatsjBJoNVV1JM63UsyWeQqVHJ22ecogfErWb0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Debattista, Jeremy" <Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jeremy ( and all),


On 18 March 2016 at 12:44, Debattista, Jeremy <
Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de> wrote:

> Hi Riccardo,
>
> I understand the concern that further “quality stuff” can (and will)
> emerge in the future. On the other hand, I do not think that restricting
> the domain of inDimension would hinder this. Actually, I think this would
> make it easier for different metrics to be interoperable as well. If we
> consider this from an application point of view, it will make it very hard
> to understand the semantics of the different quality metrics. Taking the
> example I mentioned before, how come a foaf profile suddenly can become a
> quality metric?
>

In fact,  as a consequence of the inDimension domain removal, the foaf
profile you have mentioned  is not  becoming a metric,  If someone wants
 it  as a  metric,  she/he must instantiate  it as dqv:Metric ..

If you are using inDimension alone you are basically saying "I have
something which might be connected to a quality dimension",  that's it ..


> I think inDimension domain should be restricted, and future quality stuff,
> should adhere to that restriction. Otherwise if we allow anyone to do
> anything in the DQV I’m afraid that we will end up with low quality,
> quality metadata.
>

It is not that anyone can do anything, when the stuff about quality is of
one the foreseen types ( annotations, metrics, quality policies,
standards), our  DQV document explains how it should be made fitting  ;)

@the rest of the group
Are there other members in the  group who  think  we should be more
prescriptive  and specify the  inDimension domain?
In case,  this might be a good timing  to say it..

Cheers,
Riccardo


>
> Cheers,
> Jer
>
> On 18 Mar 2016, at 12:28, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeremy,
> yes you can have basically anything connected to Dimensions.
>
>  In particular, metrics,   annotations, standards, and quality policy are
> explicitly  related to quality dimensions in  the new version of DQV.
> Of course we might have restricted   inDimension domain  only to the
> aforementioned classes, but  by  not doing so,  the door  is left open to
> further "quality stuff" which can emerge in the future.
>
> Does it make any sense to you?
>
> Cheers,
> Riccardo
>
>
>
> On 17 March 2016 at 18:07, Debattista, Jeremy <
> Jeremy.Debattista@iais.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Riccardo,
>>
>> I didn’t really understand why the domain of inDimension was removed.
>> Wouldn’t that be a bit risky, in the sense that now anything can be in a
>> dimension (technically speaking my foaf profile can be in a quality
>> dimension), right?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jer
>>
>> On 17 Mar 2016, at 17:08, Riccardo Albertoni <albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeremy,
>> As part of action 258 [1], I have to tell you that the property
>> dqv:inDimension has been revised: we decided to remove its domain  and  it
>> is currently defined as the super-property of  daq:hasMetric 's inverse.
>>
>> If you are wondering how the new inDimension looks like, you can take a
>> look at [2].
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Riccardo
>>
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/258
>> [2] http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/vocab-dqg.html#dqv:inDimension
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Riccardo Albertoni
>> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
>> Magenes"
>> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
>> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
>> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
>> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
>> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
>> www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>*
>> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
>> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Riccardo Albertoni
> Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
> Magenes"
> Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
> via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
> tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
> e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
> Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
> www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>*
> http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
> FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
>
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
Magenes"
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
e-mail: Riccardo.Albertoni@ge.imati.cnr.it
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/riccardoalbertoni
www: *http://www.imati.cnr.it/ <http://www.imati.cnr.it/>*
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/riccardoAlbertoni
FOAF:http://purl.oclc.org/NET/RiccardoAlbertoni/foaf
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 14:36:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 18 March 2016 14:36:07 UTC