W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2016

BPs on data and metadata (was: metadata on metadata quality)

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:05:41 +0100
Message-ID: <56DF0665.2010708@few.vu.nl>
To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>, Caroline Burle <cburle@nic.br>, "Newton Calegari" <newton@nic.br>
Hi Andrea, Bernadette, Caroline, Newton,

I'm flagging this to the BP editors in a new thread...


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: DQV, ISO 19115/19157 and GeoDCAT-AP - metadata on metadata quality
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:40:08 +0100
From: Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Organization: European Commission - Joint Research Centre
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
CC: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>

Hi, Antoine.

On 07/03/2016 11:45, Antoine Isaac wrote:

> Note that we could also add a note about this in the Best Practices
> document, for example when we talk about quality of data:
> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#quality
> My issue is that if we do this, then perhaps all best practices that are
> stated to apply to the data should also be stated for the metadata.
> Well, actually I have tried to do this for the two BPs I curate:
> http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#dataVocabularies ("Use standardized
> terms") and ("Reuse vocabularies")
> But fitting this aspect in the entire document properly is way beyond
> what I can offer myself here!

Just thinking aloud, but I wonder whether a scoping note could be added
to the metadata BP (http://w3c.github.io/dwbp/bp.html#metadata). As the
very first BP, it is probably the right place to add such a general
statement / caveat.


Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:06:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 8 March 2016 17:06:18 UTC