W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices document(s)]

From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:50:21 -0700
To: public-dwbp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <56E7402D.6000308@lbl.gov>
Why would we need that? The examples are fictitious and should have no 
life beyond our doc.

On 3/14/16 3:27 PM, Eric Stephan wrote:
> +1
>
> Create an appendix.
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Data on the Web Best Practices 
> Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org 
> <mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org>> wrote:
>
>     dwbp-ISSUE-250: Should we create a new section to include the
>     namespaces that are being used in the examples? [Best practices
>     document(s)]
>
>     http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/250
>
>     Raised by: Bernadette Farias Loscio
>     On product: Best practices document(s)
>
>     If not, where should we include the namespaces?
>
>
>
>

-- 
Annette Greiner
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Monday, 14 March 2016 22:50:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 14 March 2016 22:50:54 UTC