ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2011 by author

Adam Barth

• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Sunday, 17 July)

Adrien de Croy

• Re: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Monday, 19 September)
• OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #285: Strength of requirements on Accept re: 406 (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #285: Strength of requirements on Accept re: 406 (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: Content-Disposition status (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)

Alexandre Morgaut

• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: Filling out 202 Accepted (Thursday, 25 August)

Alexey Melnikov

• Re: #309: credentials ABNF missing SP (still using implied LWS?) (Friday, 5 August)

Amit Klein

• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Sunday, 17 July)

Amos Jeffries

• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: #310, was: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: OWS in httpbis-p1-messaging (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging) (Thursday, 18 August)
• Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging) (Thursday, 18 August)
• part 1 section 4.1.2 - authority form (Tuesday, 16 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: proposed part 1 section 6.3 (Friday, 5 August)
• Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: line folding - ABNF vs prose (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• RE: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #285: Strength of requirements on Accept re: 406 (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: Warnings and SHOULD (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Media-type containing semi-colon but no parameter (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Saturday, 2 July)

Ashok Kumar

• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Saturday, 30 July)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Friday, 29 July)
• if-range requests and compressed response (Thursday, 28 July)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Tuesday, 20 September)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Tracking through cache abuse (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: URI equivalence and query parameter sequence (Monday, 11 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Media-type containing semi-colon but no parameter (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Whitespace before responses (Sunday, 3 July)

Brian Pane

• Re: Pipelining clarification (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: IW10 Considered Harmful (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Pipeline hinting revisited (Thursday, 11 August)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• pipelining initial request series (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)

Chris Weber

• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Sunday, 17 July)

Dale Anderson

• Re: an edit for easy reading on 5.4.1 "byte ranges" (Friday, 26 August)
• idea for a helpful short discussion to add into section 5 (ranges) (Friday, 26 August)
• an edit for easy reading on 5.4.1 "byte ranges" (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: proposed part 1 section 6.3 (Friday, 5 August)
• proposed part 1 section 6.3 (Friday, 5 August)
• Re: motivate 6.3 product tokens (Thursday, 4 August)
• motivate 6.3 product tokens (Thursday, 4 August)
• Re: URI equivalence and query parameter sequence (Thursday, 14 July)
• Re: Whitespace before responses (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Sunday, 3 July)

Dang Thi Thu van

• Re: Please document that successful GET constitutes a retrieval (Monday, 26 September)

Dang Van

• Re: Please document that successful GET constitutes a retrieval (Tuesday, 27 September)

Daniel Stenberg

• Re: part 1 section 4.1.2 - authority form (Tuesday, 16 August)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Sunday, 3 July)

Darin Fisher

• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Monday, 4 July)

Darrel Miller

• URI equivalence and query parameter sequence (Monday, 11 July)

David Morris

• help (Sunday, 3 July)

Dzonatas Sol

• Re: status code for header fields to big (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Saturday, 2 July)

Eric J. Bowman

• Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: #285: Strength of requirements on Accept re: 406 (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: API Pagination limit (Thursday, 14 July)

Eric Lawrence

• RE: Pipelining clarification (Monday, 26 September)
• RE: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Wednesday, 21 September)
• RE: part 1 section 4.1.2 - authority form (Tuesday, 16 August)
• RE: Whitespace before responses (Thursday, 7 July)

Frank Ellermann

• OWS in httpbis-p1-messaging (Thursday, 25 August)

Frank Mertens

• Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging) (Thursday, 18 August)
• Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging) (Thursday, 18 August)
• Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging) (Thursday, 18 August)
• Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging) (Wednesday, 17 August)

Greg Wilkins

• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: #300: Define non-final responses (Tuesday, 19 July)
• RE: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)

Henrik Nordström

• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Friday, 29 July)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-16.txt (Wednesday, 24 August)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-16.txt (Wednesday, 24 August)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-16.txt (Wednesday, 24 August)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-16.txt (Wednesday, 24 August)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-16.txt (Wednesday, 24 August)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-16.txt (Wednesday, 24 August)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-16.txt (Wednesday, 24 August)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-02.txt (Wednesday, 24 August)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-15.txt (Monday, 11 July)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p3-payload-15.txt (Monday, 11 July)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-15.txt (Monday, 11 July)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-15.txt (Monday, 11 July)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-15.txt (Monday, 11 July)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-15.txt (Monday, 11 July)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-15.txt (Monday, 11 July)
• I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-06.txt (Friday, 8 July)

J Ross Nicoll

• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Thursday, 28 July)

Jan Algermissen

• Re: Status code for enforcing conditional requests (Tuesday, 27 September)
• Status code for enforcing conditional requests (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Pipelining clarification (Monday, 26 September)
• Pipelining clarification (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Wednesday, 7 September)

Jim Gettys

• IW10 Considered Harmful (Friday, 26 August)

Joe Orton

• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)

Jonas Jacek

• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)

Jonathan Rees

• Please document that successful GET constitutes a retrieval (Thursday, 22 September)

Julian Reschke

• Re: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Sunday, 25 September)
• Re: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Sunday, 25 September)
• Re: Please document that successful GET constitutes a retrieval (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: Issues with header combination text from draft -16 (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Issues with header combination text from draft -16 (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-reschke-rfc5987bis-01.txt (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: OWS, line-folding and quoted-string (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: Remaining issues related to redirects [#43 #295] (Saturday, 3 September)
• Re: Remaining issues related to redirects [#43 #295] (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Remaining issues related to redirects [#43 #295] (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Remaining issues related to redirects [#43 #295] (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Thursday, 1 September)
• Remaining issues related to redirects (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: #310, was: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Wednesday, 31 August)
• Re: #310, was: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Wednesday, 31 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Wednesday, 31 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Wednesday, 31 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Tuesday, 30 August)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Sunday, 28 August)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Sunday, 28 August)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: Filling out 202 Accepted (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: Filling out 202 Accepted (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: The use of HTTP 501 (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: 2.2 Method Registry - Not Found (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• httpbis -16 drafts (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: Filling out 202 Accepted (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Wednesday, 24 August)
• Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging) (Sunday, 21 August)
• Re: #287: LWS in auth-param ABNF (Tuesday, 9 August)
• Re: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Tuesday, 9 August)
• Re: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Tuesday, 9 August)
• Re: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Monday, 8 August)
• Re: #287: LWS in auth-param ABNF (Monday, 8 August)
• #310, was: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 8 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 8 August)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Sunday, 7 August)
• Re: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Sunday, 7 August)
• WWW-Authenticate ABNF is ambiguous (Saturday, 6 August)
• #287: LWS in auth-param ABNF (Saturday, 6 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Saturday, 6 August)
• Re: #309: credentials ABNF missing SP (still using implied LWS?) (Friday, 5 August)
• Re: #309: credentials ABNF missing SP (still using implied LWS?) (Friday, 5 August)
• Re: IESG Statement on Designating RFCs as Historic [#254] (Thursday, 4 August)
• Re: Fwd: IESG Statement on Designating RFCs as Historic [#254] (Wednesday, 3 August)
• Re: #308: need to reserve "negotiate" as auth scheme name (Wednesday, 3 August)
• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Tuesday, 2 August)
• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Thursday, 28 July)
• #308: need to reserve "negotiate" as auth scheme name (Thursday, 28 July)
• #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Wednesday, 27 July)
• #309: credentials ABNF missing SP (still using implied LWS?) (Wednesday, 27 July)
• #270: \-escaping in quoted strings (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: line folding - ABNF vs prose (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 (Wednesday, 27 July)
• line folding - ABNF vs prose (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• #257: Considerations for new authentications schemes (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #186: Document HTTP's error-handling philosophy (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (also #302) (Saturday, 23 July)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: Content-Disposition status (Wednesday, 20 July)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Tuesday, 19 July)
• #304, was: If-Range and cache validation using Last-Modified (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #285: Strength of requirements on Accept re: 406 (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #285: Strength of requirements on Accept re: 406 (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• httpbis -15 drafts (Wednesday, 13 July)
• Re: Content-Disposition status (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: #288: Considering messages in isolation (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: #288: Considering messages in isolation (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: Media-type containing semi-colon but no parameter (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: #282: Recommend minimum sizes for protocol elements (Friday, 1 July)
• #299: status code for header fields to big (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Friday, 1 July)

Karl Dubost

• HTTP 402 Payment Required (Saturday, 24 September)
• Re: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Wednesday, 31 August)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Friday, 26 August)
• 2.2 Method Registry - Not Found (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• API Pagination limit (Thursday, 14 July)

Manger, James H

• RE: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Monday, 8 August)
• RE: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Thursday, 28 July)
• RE: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Thursday, 28 July)
• RE: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• RE: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Monday, 25 July)
• RE: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)

Mark Baker

• Re: Redirects and headers (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Monday, 4 July)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Pipelining clarification (Monday, 26 September)
• Re: Issues addressed in the -16 drafts (Saturday, 17 September)
• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Monday, 12 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Saturday, 3 September)
• Re: Remaining issues related to redirects [#43 #295] (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: SHOULD-level requirements in p6-caching (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: Remaining issues related to redirects [#43 #295] (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Friday, 2 September)
• Re: #310, was: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: #310, was: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Wednesday, 31 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Wednesday, 31 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Tuesday, 30 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Tuesday, 30 August)
• Issues addressed in the -16 drafts (Tuesday, 30 August)
• Re: Issues addressed in the -15 drafts (Tuesday, 30 August)
• #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Tuesday, 30 August)
• Re: idea for a helpful short discussion to add into section 5 (ranges) (Saturday, 27 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Saturday, 27 August)
• Re: Filling out 202 Accepted (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: Filling out 202 Accepted (Friday, 26 August)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Thursday, 18 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-00.txt (Monday, 15 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Saturday, 13 August)
• Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-00.txt (Saturday, 13 August)
• Filling out 202 Accepted (Thursday, 11 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 8 August)
• Re: #287: LWS in auth-param ABNF (Monday, 8 August)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 8 August)
• Re: IESG Statement on Designating RFCs as Historic [#254] (Wednesday, 3 August)
• Re: Issue 274 (again) (Sunday, 31 July)
• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Saturday, 30 July)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: #308: need to reserve "negotiate" as auth scheme name (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Friday, 29 July)
• Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: #308: need to reserve "negotiate" as auth scheme name (Thursday, 28 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Quebec Minutes (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Updated agenda (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: Tracking through cache abuse (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Sunday, 24 July)
• #177: Realm required on challenges (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Sunday, 24 July)
• #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Sunday, 24 July)
• #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Sunday, 24 July)
• #297: p1 7.2.4: retrying requests (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (also #302) (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: Warnings and SHOULD (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #285: Strength of requirements on Accept re: 406 (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #285: Strength of requirements on Accept re: 406 (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: Warnings and SHOULD (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #285: Strength of requirements on Accept re: 406 (Sunday, 17 July)
• #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Warnings and SHOULD (Sunday, 17 July)
• #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Sunday, 17 July)
• #303: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (also #302) (Sunday, 17 July)
• #301: Content-Range on responses other than 206 (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (Friday, 15 July)
• Content-Range on responses other than 206 (Friday, 15 July)
• Generic semantics for the 400 status code (Friday, 15 July)
• Issues addressed in the -15 drafts (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: Content-Disposition status (Tuesday, 12 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Thursday, 7 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: Whitespace before responses (Tuesday, 5 July)
• 1xx response semantics (Monday, 4 July)
• Re: #295: Applying original fragment to "plain" redirected URI (also #43) (Saturday, 2 July)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: #288: Considering messages in isolation (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: #231: Considerations for new headers (Friday, 1 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Friday, 1 July)
• FYI: Session change in Quebec City - now meeting TUESDAY AM (Friday, 1 July)

Matthew Seaborn

• The use of HTTP 501 (Friday, 26 August)

Moore, Jonathan (CIM)

• Re: Warnings and SHOULD (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: Warnings and SHOULD (Sunday, 17 July)

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

• Re: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-00.txt (Tuesday, 16 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-00.txt (Tuesday, 16 August)
• Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-00.txt (Sunday, 14 August)
• Issue 274 (again) (Sunday, 31 July)

Peter Saint-Andre

• Call for feedback on web origin spec (was: Fwd: [websec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-websec-origin-02 until Aug-15) (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Sunday, 3 July)

Philippe Mougin

• Re: API Pagination limit (Friday, 15 July)

Poul-Henning Kamp

• Re: Tracking through cache abuse (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)

Robert Collins

• Re: Warnings and SHOULD (Sunday, 17 July)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Thursday, 8 September)
• Re: Expect header 'understand' vs 'meet' (Wednesday, 7 September)
• Re: #310, was: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Thursday, 1 September)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: Ambiguities in header-field rules (p1-messaging) (Thursday, 18 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: line folding - ABNF vs prose (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: If-Range and cache validation using Last-Modified (Wednesday, 20 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• pipelining initial request series (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: Redirects and headers (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Friday, 1 July)

Thomas Maslen

• RE: #195, was: ABNF for Authorization header not quite right (Thursday, 28 July)

Thomson, Martin

• RE: DELETE and 410 Gone (Thursday, 25 August)

William A. Rowe Jr.

• Re: Issues with header combination text from draft -16 (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Issues with header combination text from draft -16 (Friday, 9 September)
• Re: Issues with header combination text from draft -16 (Friday, 9 September)
• Issues with header combination text from draft -16 (Friday, 9 September)

Willy Tarreau

• Re: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Sunday, 25 September)
• Re: OT re HTTP auth disassocation of credentials (Monday, 19 September)
• Re: OWS, line-folding and quoted-string (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Wednesday, 31 August)
• Re: I-D Action: draft-nottingham-http-new-status-00.txt (Tuesday, 16 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Saturday, 30 July)
• Re: line folding - ABNF vs prose (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: line folding - ABNF vs prose (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: line folding - ABNF vs prose (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: line folding - ABNF vs prose (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Monday, 25 July)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #290: Motivate one-year limit for Expires (Sunday, 24 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #300: Define non-final responses (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: #100: DNS Spoofing / Rebinding (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: Warnings and SHOULD (Sunday, 17 July)
• Re: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: Generic semantics for the 400 status code (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 (Friday, 15 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: pipelining initial request series (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Wednesday, 6 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: 1xx response semantics (Tuesday, 5 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Sunday, 3 July)
• Re: status code for header fields to big (Sunday, 3 July)

Yngve N. Pettersen

• Re: Pipeline hinting revisited (Friday, 12 August)
• Re: #177: Realm required on challenges (Monday, 25 July)

Yutaka OIWA

• Re: OWS, line-folding and quoted-string (Tuesday, 6 September)
• OWS, line-folding and quoted-string (Tuesday, 6 September)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #78: Relationship between 401, Authorization and WWW-Authenticate (Tuesday, 26 July)

Yves Lafon

• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Monday, 5 September)
• Re: an edit for easy reading on 5.4.1 "byte ranges" (Tuesday, 30 August)
• Re: idea for a helpful short discussion to add into section 5 (ranges) (Tuesday, 30 August)
• Re: if-range requests and compressed response (Monday, 1 August)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Wednesday, 27 July)
• Re: #306: does etag value really use quoted-string (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: Content-Range on responses other than 206 (Tuesday, 26 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Thursday, 21 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Tuesday, 19 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: #160: Redirects and non-GET methods (Monday, 18 July)
• Re: If-Range and cache validation using Last-Modified (Monday, 18 July)

Last message date: Tuesday, 27 September 2011 09:23:42 UTC