Hi, I've got a TODO to mark the authentication scheme name "negotiate" as reserved (in draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations); see <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/308>. Thoughts: - the registry doesn't have a "status" entry; should we add that (with what values)? - if we keep the registry simple, what's the reference we would put in? A pointer to a new appendix in draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations, noting that "negotiate" is reserved as a scheme name, but it's not a valid scheme as per our requirements? - that being said, should there be an erratum on RFC 4559 pointing out the problems? Best regards, JulianReceived on Thursday, 28 July 2011 14:34:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:46 GMT