W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Generic semantics for the 400 status code

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:05:32 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110715140532.GD27520@1wt.eu>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:55:45PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> So, do you support the proposal I made?
> Note that this doesn't preclude minting a new status code if that's the right thing to do.

If you're talking about this :

> I think the 400 definition needs to be broadened, so that people don't invent their own status codes, or misuse existing ones.

Then yes I do support it. What I'm not in favor of is the use of the 503 that
was suggested on the openstack discussion -for this specific use- (and like
you, I too think that 403 was much closer to the need than 413).

Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 14:06:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:58 UTC