W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: #300: Define non-final responses

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:49:58 +0200
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <jio627t392ai6p0nod1702u88ejhvlgvuj@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>There is absolutely no support in the text for the notion that
>the server should send a 200 reponse between the 101 and the
>switch of protocol.

My impression is that the issue is whether you can have a HTTP
request that goes unanswered and then have meaningful exchanges
on the same connection. Is HTTP a "request-response" protocol, or
a "request and then either response or protocol switch" protocol?
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Sunday, 17 July 2011 22:50:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:58 UTC