W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: 1xx response semantics

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 02:43:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4E13AFAB.5060300@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-07-06 02:19, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> ...
> What do people think about adding text to the "Considerations for New Headers" section stating that headers may not be available on 1xx responses in some implementations?
> ...

Do you have an example of an implementation that *does* expose 1xx 
responses, but not the headers on them?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 00:44:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:44 GMT