W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: 1xx response semantics

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:17:22 +0000
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2963.1309850242@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <20110705065339.GF12909@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:
>On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 06:13:03AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>After all, saying that 101 is an exception to 1xx
>is not much different from saying that 204 is an exception to 2xx in
>that it does not hold any body.

Explaining that it is in the wrong group would make the overall scheme
clearer and hopefully deter similar additions in the future.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 07:17:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:58 UTC