W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: #231: Considerations for new headers

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:10:47 +0200
Message-ID: <4E256637.5080904@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-07-19 12:29, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> ...
> Yes. Probably just in IANA considerations; no need to actually register it using the template, just have them list it as reserved.
> ...

Ack.

> ...
>>> For example, a textual date and a URI (either of which might contain a comma) could be safely carried in field-values like these:
>>>
>>>    Example-URI-Field: "http://example.com/a.html,foo", "http://without-a-comma.example.com/"
>>>    Example-Date-Field: "Sat, 04 May 1996", "Wed, 14 Sep 2005"
>>
>> We should point out that it's a really really bad idea to sue double quotes unless you're compatible with quoted-string semantics.
>
> ... if you're using list semantics.

Even in general, when using the "parameter" pattern (such as in C-T and 
C-D).

> ...

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 11:11:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:45 GMT