W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: status code for header fields to big

From: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:24:07 -0700
Message-ID: <4E10A5B7.2090007@gmail.com>
To: Dzonatas Sol <dzonatas@gmail.com>
CC: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Due to an off-list discussion, I should mention the concept of 
virtualization in "bubbles". It's the process of phases changes and 
possible computations (now simplified to phase-change-memory), requires 
stateful-transfers (so some think non-stateless discussions is 
off-topic). There is nothing metaphorical about these ideas in the 
hydrogen economy, the connection is obvious with those that are familiar 
with memory technology (sticky subject).

On 07/03/2011 09:52 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> Proof: compare pi-r-squared to pi-r-sphered.
> Guru meditation error if that caused you to wait for the answer, yes, 
> "to the power of spheres".
> K.I.S.
> On 07/03/2011 07:59 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>> On 07/03/2011 07:53 AM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>>>> How many consider the length of the query string already given as 
>>>> the initial max length of the header lines;
>>> My guess? Exactly none. That seems like a crazy way to get an 
>>> arbitrary limit that won't interoperate at all.
>> Works when you do not know the limits of the substructure and you 
>> need something known, quick, non-stop.
>> Just seems crazy until you consider pads on the query strings, which 
>> seemed useless before.

--- http://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering
Ag-Biotech, Virtual Reality, Consultant
Received on Sunday, 3 July 2011 17:25:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:58 UTC