Re: #177: Realm required on challenges

On 2011-07-25 15:48, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-07-25 02:47, Manger, James H wrote:
>> Julian,
>>
>> The concept of a "protection space" is quite important (eg for
>> automatically applying credentials), regardless of whether or not a
>> 'realm' parameter is present. Unfortunately, the proposed patch to
>> make 'realm' optional also effectively makes a protection space
>> optional. How about changing the 1st sentence of the 2nd paragraph of
>> 2.2 "Protection Space (Realm)" to the following:
>>
>> A protection space is defined by the canonical root URI (...)
>> of the server being accessed, in combination with the realm
>> value if present.
>  > ...
>
> OK; new proposed patch:
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/177/177.diff>.
> ...

...applied with 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/177/177.diff>.

Best regards, Julian