W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: #177: Realm required on challenges

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:47:48 +0200
Message-ID: <4E2EE1A4.2060704@gmx.de>
To: "Manger, James H" <James.H.Manger@team.telstra.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2011-07-25 15:48, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-07-25 02:47, Manger, James H wrote:
>> Julian,
>>
>> The concept of a "protection space" is quite important (eg for
>> automatically applying credentials), regardless of whether or not a
>> 'realm' parameter is present. Unfortunately, the proposed patch to
>> make 'realm' optional also effectively makes a protection space
>> optional. How about changing the 1st sentence of the 2nd paragraph of
>> 2.2 "Protection Space (Realm)" to the following:
>>
>> A protection space is defined by the canonical root URI (...)
>> of the server being accessed, in combination with the realm
>> value if present.
>  > ...
>
> OK; new proposed patch:
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/177/177.diff>.
> ...

...applied with 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/177/177.diff>.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 15:48:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:46 GMT