W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: #300: Define non-final responses

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 19:51:45 -0700
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6D51BE04-5C3A-49F7-BA62-6E8880008D88@gbiv.com>
To: Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com>
On Jul 17, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Adrien de Croy wrote:

> For an intermediary, Upgrade + 101 needs to be handled like CONNECT + 200.

No.  Look, I don't know how any of you got the impression that Upgrade
is a request to turn into a tunnel, but that simply is not the case.
It cannot be implemented that way.  Please don't try.  You are not supposed
to upgrade the connection if you don't know how to upgrade the connection.

Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 02:52:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:58 UTC