Re: #231: Considerations for new headers

Le 29 juin 2011 à 06:17, Mark Nottingham a écrit :
> 3.1 Considerations for Creating Header Fields
[…]

Not sure if it's true, but in case it is. After this 

>  Under no conditions can the "Close" field-name be registered, because it is reserved for use as a connection token.


Should there be a mention discouraging the rewriting of headers to change the behavior of an existing header. 

	"Under no conditions a new header should 
	redefine requirements of an existing 
	header." 

I think about the case of proxies rewriting headers and then changing the behavior of the message. Mark already commented on this thread.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4798461/cneonction-and-nncoection-http-headers

Cneonction 
nnCoection

It is still strange to me :) 


-- 
Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software