W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: 1xx response semantics

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:52:28 +0200
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Joe Orton <joe@manyfish.co.uk>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110705225228.GA18576@1wt.eu>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 04:50:35PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20110705164148.GA5119@manyfish.co.uk>, Joe Orton writes:
> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 07:14:01AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> 
> >> It's not exact because of 101 which should contain at least Upgrade and
> >> Connection: Upgrade. In fact, 101 is a final status while 100 is an
> >> intermediate one.
> >
> >That is not true, the client must wait for the final response on the 
> >upgraded connection.
> 
> As far as HTTP is concerned it is final, we have no idea what the
> upgraded protocol is or what semantics it might have.

Agreed, and I'd also add that seeing nothing else might very well be a
valid final response for the upgraded protocol.

Willy
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 22:54:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:44 GMT