W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: 1xx response semantics

From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:51:11 +0200
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20110705065111.GE12909@1wt.eu>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:51:37PM +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >Maybe we should indicate that "headers are not significant on intermediate
> >responses such as 1xx, and are only meaningful on final responses such as
> >all other ones, including 101" ?
> >
> Its always puzzled me why Upgrade got 101 while CONNECT gets 200. They 
> are not that dissimilar.

I perfectly agree with you on this, the issue is that it's been spec'd
like this and we have to live with it (as with a lot of special cases
for many other things).

Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 06:52:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:58 UTC