W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: 1xx response semantics

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:13:03 +0000
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <13323.1309846383@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <20110705051401.GB12909@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes:

>In fact, 101 is a final status while 100 is an intermediate one.

That has always bugged, me: I think 101 should have been a 2xx or 3xx

Maybe simply acknowleding rather than generalizing from this mistake
is the best idea ?

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 06:13:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:58 UTC