Hi Julian, Nice work, really ! It's very clear this way and the history will help some developers understand that what they once believed might have evolved. I noticed a very minor typo though : On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 04:30:50PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote: > 7.3. Redirection 3xx (...) > 4. Other kinds of redirection, such as to a cached result (status > code 304 (Not Modified)). (...) > Section 10.3.8). Over 10 years later, most user agents still do > method rewriting for status codes 301 and 302, therefore this > specification make that behavior compliant in case the original ^^^^ makes Best regards, WillyReceived on Wednesday, 31 August 2011 22:23:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:47 GMT