- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:50:35 +0000
- To: Joe Orton <joe@manyfish.co.uk>
- cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <20110705164148.GA5119@manyfish.co.uk>, Joe Orton writes: >On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 07:14:01AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: >> It's not exact because of 101 which should contain at least Upgrade and >> Connection: Upgrade. In fact, 101 is a final status while 100 is an >> intermediate one. > >That is not true, the client must wait for the final response on the >upgraded connection. As far as HTTP is concerned it is final, we have no idea what the upgraded protocol is or what semantics it might have. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 16:51:14 UTC