W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: 1xx response semantics

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:50:35 +0000
To: Joe Orton <joe@manyfish.co.uk>
cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5168.1309884635@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <20110705164148.GA5119@manyfish.co.uk>, Joe Orton writes:
>On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 07:14:01AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:

>> It's not exact because of 101 which should contain at least Upgrade and
>> Connection: Upgrade. In fact, 101 is a final status while 100 is an
>> intermediate one.
>
>That is not true, the client must wait for the final response on the 
>upgraded connection.

As far as HTTP is concerned it is final, we have no idea what the
upgraded protocol is or what semantics it might have.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 16:51:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:44 GMT