On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:45:53AM +0900, Yutaka OIWA wrote: > The literal reading of "3.2.1 obs-fold rule" says that a line-folding > "CR LF SP" should be reduced to either "SP SP" or "SP SP SP" > (because CRLF is reduced to single SP). Is this correct and intended? > I guess the intention of the first alternative is "SP" instead of "SP SP". I think the first case is to cover "LF SP" since implementations should be tolerant to LF-only line delimiting. Then, the LF is replaced with an SP, which leads to "SP SP". > As obs-fold is guaranteed to be followed by WSP, it can be simply removed > instead of replacing to single SP. The goal was to be able to replace CRs and LFs with SPs without moving data nor changing a packet length, so that unfolding is very cheap and leaves no excuse to implementations for not doing it. Regards, WillyReceived on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 05:50:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:47 GMT