Re: #178: Content-MD5 and partial responses

Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> >
> > There are a couple references to Content-MD5 remaining, which is
> > confusing now that no Content-MD5 section exists; I suggest removing
> > mention of Content-MD5 from the following, perhaps making a note or
> > two in the "changes from RFC 2616" sections:  p1 7.1.3.2, p2 7.4.
> 
> P1: not sure - this is about non-modifiable headers. Does deprecating 
> C-MD5 change this?
> 

Maybe just add "(deprecated)" there?

-Eric

Received on Friday, 29 July 2011 00:22:35 UTC