xml-dist-app@w3.org from November 2001 by author

'Alan Kent'

• Re: counterproposal on issue #144 (Wednesday, 21 November)

Alan Kent

• Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: counterproposal on issue #144 (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Summary: Sparse Arrays (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Tuesday, 13 November)

Andrew Layman

• RE: proposed resolution for issue #18 - "top level" unclear (Tuesday, 27 November)
• RE: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Tuesday, 20 November)
• RE: counterproposal on issue #144 (Tuesday, 20 November)
• RE: proposed resolution to issues #159 and #166 - encodingStyle (Tuesday, 20 November)
• RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Thursday, 8 November)
• RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Monday, 5 November)
• RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Monday, 5 November)
• RE: issue #144 proposal - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Thursday, 1 November)

Asir S Vedamuthu

• Issue 169: Forward References in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: Summary: Sparse Arrays (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Summary: Sparse Arrays (Tuesday, 13 November)
• ETF: Proposed Resolution to Issue #1 (Saturday, 3 November)

Barbara Price

• RE: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (Thursday, 1 November)

bdawson@miramar.com

• XML processing (Tuesday, 13 November)

Bob Cunnings

• Re: i154: are roles invariant? (Thursday, 29 November)

BSanjay

• Soap namespaces.. (Thursday, 15 November)

Christopher Ferris

• Re: i154: are roles invariant? (Friday, 30 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Thursday, 1 November)

Dan Brickley

• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• [soapbuilders] testing methodology for SOAP Encoding? (fwd) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Issue -999 (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Thursday, 1 November)

Dan Gunter

• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 7 November)

Dave Waite

• messages only as documents? (Wednesday, 28 November)

David E. Cleary

• SOAP and dynamic structures (Thursday, 29 November)

David Fallside

• Transport Binding Reviews (Friday, 30 November)

don

• New XML web application server (Thursday, 29 November)

Doug Davis

• Re: i154: are roles invariant? (Thursday, 29 November)
• Proposed text for issue 155 (Thursday, 29 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Issue 153: overlapping section 2 and 4 (Monday, 19 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Saturday, 17 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Saturday, 17 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Monday, 12 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) (Tuesday, 6 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) (Tuesday, 6 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: Issue 146 (Monday, 5 November)

Enrico Zerilli

• Hi (Thursday, 8 November)

Guillermo González Arroyave

• Error ... (Friday, 16 November)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: proposed resolution for issue #18 - "top level" unclear (Friday, 23 November)
• RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 21 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Wednesday, 21 November)
• FYI: DIME available as IETF internet draft (Saturday, 17 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Issue 146 proposed resolution (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: Formalism in SOAP spec (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 7 November)

Herve Ruellan

• Re: i154: are roles invariant? (Friday, 30 November)

Hugo Haas

• Missing testable assertions (scan of part 1 section 4) (Thursday, 29 November)
• Re: Proposal for resolving issue 40: Support resource constrained devices (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Comments on issue 101 (Friday, 2 November)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: ETF: Issue 47 (SOAP Data Model) (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Monday, 26 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Friday, 23 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks (Thursday, 22 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Thursday, 22 November)
• RE: proposed resolution to issues #159 and #166 - encodingStyle (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: counterproposal on issue #144 (Wednesday, 21 November)
• RE: counterproposal on issue #144 (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: counterproposal on issue #144 (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks (Tuesday, 20 November)
• New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks (Tuesday, 20 November)
• proposed resolution to issues #159 and #166 - encodingStyle (Tuesday, 20 November)
• counterproposal on issue #144 (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Tuesday, 20 November)
• proposed resolution to issue #117 (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: Proposal for resolving #171 - attributes on references (Tuesday, 20 November)
• latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Proposal for resolving #171 - attributes on references (Tuesday, 20 November)
• S21 proposed sample implementation (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Proposal for resolving issue 40: Support resource constrained devices (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Issue 169: Forward References in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: Issue 169: Forward References in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: Summary: Sparse Arrays (Tuesday, 13 November)
• RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Monday, 12 November)
• RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Monday, 12 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Thursday, 8 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 7 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 7 November)
• proposed resolution for issue #18 - "top level" unclear (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Tuesday, 6 November)
• RE: issue #144 proposal - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Thursday, 1 November)
• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Thursday, 1 November)

James M Snell

• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks (Tuesday, 27 November)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• i154: are roles invariant? (Thursday, 29 November)
• Re: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review (Tuesday, 27 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Friday, 23 November)
• Re: Boxcarring out of scope? (Friday, 23 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Thursday, 22 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks (Thursday, 22 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between headerand body blocks (Thursday, 22 November)
• Boxcarring out of scope? (Thursday, 22 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Thursday, 22 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: Issue 68 - status information (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: Comments on issue 101 (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: Comments on issue 101 (Friday, 9 November)

John Ibbotson

• Latest Usage Scenarios (Monday, 19 November)
• RE: Usage Scenarios (Thursday, 15 November)

Jones, Matthew

• RE: Formalism in SOAP spec (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: Formalism in SOAP spec (Wednesday, 14 November)

MacAndrew, Tim

• RE: Formalism in SOAP spec (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: Formalism in SOAP spec (Wednesday, 14 November)

Marc Hadley

• Re: Boxcarring out of scope? (Thursday, 22 November)
• ETF: Issue 47 (SOAP Data Model) (Wednesday, 21 November)
• ETF: Issue 162 (Use of ABNF in production rules) (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: Typo in Example 2 (Monday, 19 November)
• Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Monday, 12 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Wednesday, 7 November)

Mark Baker

• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• In Memoriam - Henry Lowe (Wednesday, 14 November)
• I-D ACTION:draft-baker-http-resource-state-model-01.txt (fwd) (Sunday, 11 November)

Mark Nottingham

• FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-cunnings-salz-soap-auth-00.txt (Monday, 5 November)

Martin Gudgin

• Remove NOTATION type (Wednesday, 28 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Formalism in SOAP spec (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Formalism in SOAP spec (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Monday, 5 November)
• Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Monday, 5 November)
• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Thursday, 1 November)

Marwan Sabbouh

• Meta issue 54 [1]--proposed resolution (Tuesday, 20 November)

Murali Janakiraman

• RE: counterproposal on issue #144 (Wednesday, 21 November)
• RE: counterproposal on issue #144 (Wednesday, 21 November)
• RE: counterproposal on issue #144 (Wednesday, 21 November)
• RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Tuesday, 13 November)
• RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Monday, 12 November)
• RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Friday, 9 November)
• RE: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Thursday, 8 November)

Nilo Mitra (EMX)

• RE: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review (Thursday, 29 November)
• RE: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review (Wednesday, 28 November)
• SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: Usage Scenarios (Wednesday, 14 November)

Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

• Possible issue: uniqueness of IDs (Friday, 30 November)
• RE: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review (Friday, 30 November)
• Re: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review (Thursday, 29 November)
• Re: TBTF Intro text comment (Wednesday, 28 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Saturday, 17 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Saturday, 17 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Friday, 16 November)
• Re: Proposal for resolving issue 40: Support resource constrained devices (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Thursday, 15 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Wednesday, 14 November)
• RE: Formalism in SOAP spec (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Request to open new issue: version faults vs. client faults (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Formalism in SOAP spec (Wednesday, 14 November)
• Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Monday, 12 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Monday, 12 November)
• Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Monday, 12 November)
• Re: Issue 135 - Re: discarding incorrect namespaces (Monday, 12 November)
• Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Friday, 9 November)
• Re: Spaces allowed in XML element names (Friday, 9 November)
• Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Issue 146 (Monday, 5 November)

Oisin Hurley

• RE: Issue 68 - status information (Tuesday, 13 November)

Pae Choi

• SOAP v1.1 ========> SOAP v1.2 (Friday, 9 November)

Paul Denning

• Re: i154: are roles invariant? (Friday, 30 November)

Raghu Rajah

• Typo in Example 2 (Thursday, 15 November)

Raj Nair

• Re: TBTF Intro text comment (Wednesday, 28 November)
• TBTF Intro text comment (Wednesday, 28 November)

RGerber@iworksoftware.com

• Spaces allowed in XML element names (Friday, 9 November)

Rich Salz

• Re: i154: are roles invariant? (Friday, 30 November)
• Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Wednesday, 21 November)
• Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: New encoding issue - consistency and sanity checks (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: latest proposal on issues #144 and #161 - array encoding (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: Proposal for resolving #171 - attributes on references (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: Proposal for resolving #171 - attributes on references (Tuesday, 20 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Tuesday, 13 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Monday, 12 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encod ing (Monday, 12 November)
• [Fwd: [soapbuilders] Invitation to join "Round 2" interop testing] (Saturday, 10 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: RSVP: Resolution to issue #29 satisfactory? (fwd) (Thursday, 8 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: updated proposal on issue #144 - array metadata in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 7 November)
• Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Tuesday, 6 November)
• Re: FWD: I-D ACTION:draft-cunnings-salz-soap-auth-00.txt (Monday, 5 November)

Sam

• Merry Christmas! (Friday, 30 November)

Scott Cantor

• RE: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes (Wednesday, 21 November)

Simon Fell

• Re: Proposal for resolving issue 40: Support resource constrained devices (Thursday, 15 November)
• Re: Issue 169: Forward References in SOAP Encoding (Wednesday, 14 November)

William A. Nagy

• ANN: Language for Enabling Sites to be Inspected for the Presence of Web Services (Friday, 2 November)

Williams, Stuart

• RE: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks (Wednesday, 28 November)
• RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution (Wednesday, 21 November)
• RE: Issue 153: overlapping section 2 and 4 (Monday, 19 November)
• Issue 32/R307: Suitability for use across organisational boundar ies (Friday, 16 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) (Wednesday, 7 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) (Tuesday, 6 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) (Tuesday, 6 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (default and anon actors, endpoints and ultimate re cipients - for danbri :-)) (Tuesday, 6 November)
• RE: Issue 146 (Monday, 5 November)
• Issue 146 (Monday, 5 November)

Yves Lafon

• Re: i154: are roles invariant? (Thursday, 29 November)
• minutes of 21/11/2001 teleconference (Tuesday, 27 November)
• minutes of 7/11 and 14/11 teleconferences (Thursday, 22 November)
• minutes of 31/10/2001 teleconference (Wednesday, 14 November)

Last message date: Friday, 30 November 2001 15:43:30 UTC