- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:36:10 +0000
- To: Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
- CC: hugo@w3.org, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com wrote: > Mark Hadley writes: > > >>>Thus 2 and 3 should be treated as version >>> > errors whereas 4 would be a "Client" fault. > > I think I agree, at least in the case of the root element. Does the same > reasoning apply to, e.g. the immediate children of <envelope> (which are > expected to be Header, Body, etc.)? Thanks. > I think the same reasoning should apply. Once the receiver has established that the sender is sending a SOAP 1.2 envelope (by checking the namespace on the root element) then any malformation of the envelope would be a "Client" fault. This would include things like wrong element names, multiple "Header" or "Body" elements, etc. Regards, Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 05:38:24 UTC