Re: Proposal for hierarchical fault codes

>  such a goal, if explicit, would imply that everybody and their
> pet would have to know SOAP Encoding. This would make Encoding
> core.

I never said everybody.  I said the core.  Actually, I never even said
that, I said SOAP Fault. I'm not trying to address a general issue, and
I'm not worried about "slippery slope" arguments. Each data-defining
group can address the issue, or not, as they see fit.

>  "The XML structure of fault is modeled as compatible with the
> Encoding rules (see Adjuncts) but it does not require Encoding
> processing; i.e. it is deserializable using Encoding
> deserializer, it MUST be serialized in a fixed way indicated by
> the schema."

Oh heck, you don't even have to say that much.  Just say "By design,
this definition is compatible with the SOAP Encoding rules."
Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 10:56:39 UTC