- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 10:58:57 -0500
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- CC: XML Protocol Discussion <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> such a goal, if explicit, would imply that everybody and their > pet would have to know SOAP Encoding. This would make Encoding > core. I never said everybody. I said the core. Actually, I never even said that, I said SOAP Fault. I'm not trying to address a general issue, and I'm not worried about "slippery slope" arguments. Each data-defining group can address the issue, or not, as they see fit. > "The XML structure of fault is modeled as compatible with the > Encoding rules (see Adjuncts) but it does not require Encoding > processing; i.e. it is deserializable using Encoding > deserializer, it MUST be serialized in a fixed way indicated by > the schema." Oh heck, you don't even have to say that much. Just say "By design, this definition is compatible with the SOAP Encoding rules." /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures, Encryption) http://www.zolera.com
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2001 10:56:39 UTC