Re: Issue 146 proposed resolution

+1 (sorry Gudge, only [-1,+1] 8-)

I see no merit to that proposal.

> Only as a mandatory extension and only by effectively redeploying *all*
> existing SOAP nodes.

Right, plus we wouldn't be able to keep the existing attribute based
syntax, since our mandatory extension mechanism is element based.
We'd have to have something like;

 <myheader id="foo" ... />
 <actors mustUnderstand="1">
  <actor ref="foo" value="http://...">
  <actor ref="some-other-id-to-another-header" value="http://...">


Mark Baker, CSO, Planetfred.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.

Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 10:48:42 UTC