- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:58:37 -0500
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- CC: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1 Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: >I think this is fine - thanks for writing this up! > >Henrik > >>"A SOAP Node that acts in the role of the anonymous actor with >>respect to a particular SOAP message becomes the ultimate >>recipient of that SOAP message. Such a SOAP node is >>responsible for processing all parts of the message intended >>for the anonymous actor, including the body, according to the >>rules described in this section. The SOAP message path for >>that message ends at the ultimate recipient. However, the >>ultimate recipient may delegate all or part of its >>responsibility to other entities. The ultimate recipient may >>happen to use distinct SOAP message exchanges to interact with >>such entities. Nevertheless, responsibility for the processing >>of parts of a SOAP message targetted at the anonymous actor >>rests with the ultimate recipient of that message". >> >
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 14:02:37 UTC