- From: Raj Nair <rnair@cisco.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:59:37 -0500
- To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
In the section entitled "Introduction to the SOAP Binding Framework", para 2: The last statement allows different transports on different message hops. However, in the case of an end-to-end security association an assumption is made about the willingness of an intermediary to accept this message even if it is unwilling or unable to do participate. I propose adding the following text at the end of that paragraph: An intermediary MUST generate a SOAP fault if it is not able to accept a SOAP message without violating existing end-to-end conditions of the message. ---Raj
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2001 22:19:09 UTC