- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:36:25 -0800
- To: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
No, there is only one default/anonymous actor. It may, however, not be possible to determine who that node is until the message arrives at the node. The formulation that I suggested did not (at least not intentionally) indicate that there are more than one default/anonymous actor. >Agreed. The question in my mind is, exactly how do we model it. As I >understand Henrik, he is saying: "there can be two nodes (and I mean >"node" in exactly the formal sense of chapter 2) in the path >taken by a >given message both of which act in the role of the anonymous actor, >neither of which is considered an intermediary; nonetheless, >the first >one of these relays (again in the formal sense of "relay" per >chapter 2) >the message to the second. Henrik
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 12:37:18 UTC