- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:58:48 +0100
- To: Oisin Hurley <ohurley@iona.com>
- CC: xml-dist-app@w3c.org
Is this not already supported by header blocks anyway (i.e. you could define a new header block for exactly that purpose), or am I missing something? Jean-Jacques. Oisin Hurley wrote: > Excerpt from the agenda: > > >. Issue 68, convey status information [13] (1.25 + 15) > >Requirement 703b [14] says ".... must define a mechanism or mechanisms to > >allow the transfer of status information within an XMLP message without > >resort to use of XMLP fault messages....". We need to clarify what exactly > >is meant by this requirement, decide whether or not to keep it, and if so > >how do we resolve it. > > .. the intent behind this requirement was to allow information not > related to the results of an operation to flow back with a > response - the use case being that status information could be put in > the message without having to resort to using fault messages. I can't > recall with any clarity exact details of what was required - it is also > with limited recall that I think Ray Denenberg may have been the source > of this requirement. Ray, can you confirm or deny? > > cheers > --oh
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 03:59:14 UTC