Thursday, 20 December 2012
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: Comments on "The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML"
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: Comments on "The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML"
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
Tuesday, 18 December 2012
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: Feedback about the BOM article
- Re: For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- For review: The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML
- Re: Feedback about the BOM article
Friday, 14 December 2012
- Re: follow-up on case sensitivity for user-defined identifiers in CSS
- follow-up on case sensitivity for user-defined identifiers in CSS
- Re: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC
- Re: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC
Thursday, 13 December 2012
Wednesday, 12 December 2012
- Re: some case-insensitivity cases to test
- Re: some case-insensitivity cases to test
- Re: some case-insensitivity cases to test
- re: some case-insensitivity cases to test
- re: some case-insensitivity cases to test
Tuesday, 11 December 2012
Monday, 10 December 2012
- RE: Final ping on turtle i18n issues
- [Bug 15359] Make BOM trump HTTP
- Re: Feedback about the BOM article
- Re: Feedback about the BOM article
- Re: Feedback about the BOM article
- Re: Feedback about the BOM article
- Re: Feedback about the BOM article
- Re: Feedback about the BOM article
- RE: Final ping on turtle i18n issues
- Feedback about the BOM article
Friday, 7 December 2012
Thursday, 6 December 2012
- Re: Comments on "The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML"
- Re: Comments on "The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML"
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
- Re: Comments on "The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML"
- Re: Comments on "The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML"
- Re: Comments on "The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML"
- Comments on "The byte-order mark (BOM) in HTML"
Tuesday, 4 December 2012
- RE: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC
- RE: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC
- Re: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC [I18N-ACTION-157]
- Re: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC
- RE: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC
- Re: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC [I18N-ACTION-157]
- Re: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC [I18N-ACTION-157]
Monday, 3 December 2012
- RE: Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC [I18N-ACTION-157]
- Results of CSS case-sensitivity discussion at TPAC
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
- [Bug 15359] Make BOM trump HTTP
- [Bug 15359] Make BOM trump HTTP
- [Bug 15359] Make BOM trump HTTP
- [Bug 15359] Make BOM trump HTTP
Monday, 26 November 2012
- Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-166: isolate and direction property location
- Re: [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- [Bug 15359] Make BOM trump HTTP
Thursday, 22 November 2012
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: BOM and the W3C Internationalization Checker
- BOM and the W3C Internationalization Checker
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
Wednesday, 21 November 2012
- RE: byte order mark article
- RE: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- Re: byte order mark article
- byte order mark article
- [minutes] Internationalization WG telecon, 21 Nov 2012
- [minutes] Internationalization WG telecon, 14 Nov 2012
- [minutes] Internationalization WG telecon, 7 Nov 2012
- Re: Summary of I18N discussion in HTML WG today
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
- Re: Follow up on regular expressions in ITS 2.0
- Re: Follow up on regular expressions in ITS 2.0
- Re: Follow up on regular expressions in ITS 2.0
- Re: Follow up on regular expressions in ITS 2.0
- Re: Follow up on regular expressions in ITS 2.0
Monday, 19 November 2012
- Re: Follow up on regular expressions in ITS 2.0
- RE: Summary of I18N discussion in HTML WG today
- Re: Summary of I18N discussion in HTML WG today
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
Monday, 12 November 2012
Saturday, 10 November 2012
Friday, 9 November 2012
- Re: Summary of I18N discussion in HTML WG today
- RE: Summary of I18N discussion in HTML WG today
- Re: Summary of I18N discussion in HTML WG today
- Re: Summary of I18N discussion in HTML WG today
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
Monday, 5 November 2012
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
Sunday, 4 November 2012
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- Re: Encoding Standard at F2F
- RE: Encoding Standard at F2F
Saturday, 3 November 2012
Friday, 2 November 2012
Wednesday, 31 October 2012
Wednesday, 24 October 2012
Monday, 22 October 2012
Sunday, 21 October 2012
- [Bug 19214] i18n-ISSUE-195: No further ruby element descendants
- Re: Proposal to NOT address I18N-ISSUE-183: Use of types questionable?
Thursday, 18 October 2012
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
- Re: New ECMAScript Internationalization API Specification draft
- [Bug 19214] i18n-ISSUE-195: No further ruby element descendants
- [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-168: Incorrect Japanese for nihongo in example
- [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-167: Example of Bidirectional Text
- [css3-writing-modes] i18n-ISSUE-166: isolate and direction property location
- Proposal to NOT address I18N-ISSUE-183: Use of types questionable?
- Re: New ECMAScript Internationalization API Specification draft
- Proposal to address I18N-ISSUE-193: reference obs-language-tag instead of defining your own
- Re: New ECMAScript Internationalization API Specification draft
- Re: New ECMAScript Internationalization API Specification draft
Tuesday, 16 October 2012
- [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5
- [Bug 16166] i18n-ISSUE-138: Make lang and xml:lang synonyms in HTML5
Monday, 15 October 2012
Sunday, 14 October 2012
Sunday, 7 October 2012
Thursday, 4 October 2012
Wednesday, 3 October 2012
Tuesday, 2 October 2012
- Re: explanation of I18N-ISSUE-190: attempting to erase combining marks?
- Proposal to address I18N-ISSUE-191: Various nits in Appendix B
- Proposal to NOT address I18N-ISSUE-193: define when escapes are evaluated marks?
- Re: explanation of I18N-ISSUE-190: attempting to erase combining marks?
- explanation of I18N-ISSUE-190: attempting to erase combining marks?
- explaination of I18N-ISSUE-188: special handling of % in IRI
- Proposal to address I18N-ISSUE-184: Malformed escapes examples
- Proposal to NOT address I18N-ISSUE-182: cultural relevance of examples
- Proposal to address I18N-ISSUE-181: Non-ASCII IRI example
- Proposal to address I18N-ISSUE-180: Various random character references should be more explicit label
- Proposal to address I18N-ISSUE-178: Reference IETF BCP 47 for language declaration label