- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:42:17 +0100
- To: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
- Cc: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, www International <www-international@w3.org>
Asmus Freytag, Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:25:49 -0800: > On 12/20/2012 3:53 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote: >> How about being consistent about writing >> >> byte order mark >> >> and not >> >> byte-order mark >> >> since the former is the official form? > > And not to forget, BYTE ORDER MARK, when indicating the formal identifier. So then, let me rephrase my proposal: How about using the formal identifier rather than 'byte-order mark'? PS: I personally like the hyphened version. So this proposal is only based on a wish to promote the official codification. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2012 15:42:41 UTC